Diocese of Montreal gets everything backwards

The synod of the Diocese of Montreal voted to support keeping the long gun registry, which would  cost Canadian taxpayers another billion dollars and criminals nothing at all. The synod also voted to oppose “tough on crime legislation” which would most probably expose Canadian taxpayers to more crime, leaving them less money to pay for the long gun registry, and ease the burden on criminals trying to make a dishonest living.

There was also broad support for the objectives of the Occupy Movement – whatever they are.

It appears that God did not intrude upon the meeting in any way.

Not bad for one synod.

From here:

Delegates to the 152nd synod of the Diocese of Montreal voted by strong majorities to urge the federal government to rethink its plans to abolish the long-gun registry and to adopt tough-on-crime legislation expected to greatly increase the prison population.

[….]

Another resolution, with support from the Revd Canon David Sinclair among others, gave some support to the objectives of the Occupy Montreal protestors against income disparity and other social ills. It supports “Occupy Montreal and all others who have drawn attention to the grave disparities of the current economic systems.”

On Koran burning

Burning Korans is never out of the news for very long. Most recently, rioters in Afghanistan killed 12 people after four Korans were burned by the U.S. military because imprisoned terrorists were using them to exchange clandestine messages. That’s three people per Koran. Before that, Pastor Terry Jones decided to burn a Koran for reasons never satisfactorily explained and we have enjoyed a few Burn the Koran days since then.

The Koran is Islam’s “holy book”. What does that mean? Islam’s claim is that the words of the Koran are Allah’s words: it is holy – sublime and pure – because it contains God’s words. Of course, if it doesn’t contain God’s words, it isn’t holy at all: it is a vile deception which contrives to lead those who read it into confusion and perdition – burning is too good for it. As a Christian, I am inclined to the latter view. There may be a middle ground between these extremes, but I suspect not.

We are frequently enjoined to respect Islam; as a Christian, I feel beholden to respect Muslims since they, like everyone else, are made in God’s image. I can’t see much reason to respect the transparently arrant nonsense that is Islam, though.

So, if Islam is not true and the Koran is not holy, there is no more reason to avoid burning it than to avoid burning the Tropic of Cancer and Muslims really should grow up and stop being so over-sensitive. Many won’t, though and that’s why most people would prefer to stick a firecracker up a bull’s nose than burn a Koran.

Nevertheless, occasionally Korans are burned; why?

Sometimes it is accidental; that was probably the case for the latest conflagration in Afghanistan. Its being an accident didn’t lessen the fury of those who were waiting patiently for an excuse – any excuse – to riot, shoot guns in the air, scream, burn flags and murder people.

Sometimes it is an expression of contempt for Islam. That appears to be the case for both Terry Jones and the Burn the Koran crowd. Since Christians are supposed to draw people to Christ through their words and example, it’s difficult to see why a Christian would view burning the Koran as anything but counter-productive to his primary calling. Even burning the Origin of Species to irritate an atheist, although tempting, is something Christians should avoid. Especially during Lent.

A secularist burning a Koran to demonstrate his contempt for all it represents doesn’t seem to me to be such a bad way to exercise freedom of expression, especially since the pyromaniac would be demonstrating the virtue of bravery (or possibly the vice of stupidity) by doing it in the full knowledge that his days of incendiary exploits were likely to be summarily curtailed by those he seeks to enlighten.

To come back to Afghanistan: the latest incidents have persuaded me that, worthy though the attempt to introduce civilisation to barbarism may be, the West no longer has the stomach to exert the force necessary to bring the effort to fruition. Without that, it’s all a tragic waste.

A parishioner who disbelieves in the Resurrection asks if he should stay in the Anglican Church of Canada

Angus Hamilton doesn’t believe that God is a trinity of persons, doesn’t believe in the supernatural, the Resurrection, the after-life, heaven and hell or that the Bible is God’s written revelation to man.

This has driven him to wonder whether he should leave the Anglican Church of Canada. Angus, if your fear is that you may feel out of place if you continue in the Anglican Church of Canada, rest assured, you will fit right in.

From here (page 1):

“I believe in a God of the Universe who created the laws of physics and chemistry and the processes that have enabled life to evolve and to continue evolving on planet earth.

“I don’t believe in a personal God, in an old avuncular figure who created the world and all that is in it about 7,000 years ago.

“I believe the Bible is a valuable book of wisdom to be read as all great literature is read, – as stories that convey an important message.

“I don’t believe that the Bible is literally true. “I believe that the idea of heaven and hell was conceived by a tribal leader who couldn’t otherwise persuade his tribe to do what he thought they should do, and that it has been widely used in governance ever since.

“I don’t believe in an after-life, in heaven and hell. “I believe there is a higher power that mankind does not yet understand, just as it did not understand electromagnetic radiation until about 300 years ago. “I don’t believe in the supernatural. Thus there is much in the Bible, including the resurrection story, that I do not believe. “I believe in the teachings of Jesus that can definitely be attributed to him.

“I don’t believe that everything in the Bible attributed to Jesus was said or done by him.

“I believe that the concept of ‘Church’ is important, and that a quite different form of church will evolve.

“I don’t believe that the established churches can continue with ‘business as usual.’”

Alberta government prevents home-schools from teaching that homosexual acts are sinful

From here:

EDMONTON, Alberta, February 23, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Under Alberta’s new Education Act, homeschoolers and faith-based schools will not be permitted to teach that homosexual acts are sinful as part of their academic program, says the spokesperson for Education Minister Thomas Lukaszuk.

“Whatever the nature of schooling – homeschool, private school, Catholic school – we do not tolerate disrespect for differences,” Donna McColl, Lukaszuk’s assistant director of communications, told LifeSiteNews on Wednesday evening.

“You can affirm the family’s ideology in your family life, you just can’t do it as part of your educational study and instruction,” she added.

The assistant director of communications appears not to have noticed that her claim not to tolerate disrespect for differences is rendered somewhat empty considering she is unable to show much respect for views that differ from hers.

Obama apologises for Koran burning, Afghans chant "death to Obama"

That was predictable.

From here:

President Barack Obama has apologised to the Afghan people for the burning of Korans by American troops at a US base.

In a letter to President Hamid Karzai, Mr Obama expressed his “deep regret” and said the incident earlier this week was a genuine mistake.

Demonstrations against the desecration have continued for a third day across northern and eastern Afghanistan.

Two foreign soldiers, believed to be Americans, have been killed, along with at least six Afghan people.

[….]

Crowds shouting “death to Obama” have been throwing stones and setting fire to the US flag.

Meanwhile the Taliban has called on Afghans to kill and beat all invading forces in revenge for “insulting” the Koran.

On the principle that one might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb, why not get it over with, burn all the Korans, replace them with Bibles, withdraw all the troops, light the blue touchpaper and stand clear.

A revolting new word: Anglimergent

On close inspection, “Anglimergent” seems to be a combination of “Anglican” and “emergent”.

One meaning for “emergent” is rising above a surrounding medium, especially a fluid. This conjures the image – for me at least – of Anglimergent members bobbing about floating in a liquefied Anglican ether, rather like faecal matter in a tide of sewage.

That might not be what was intended; fortunately, there is a website that explains all. Anglimergent is:

A relational network of Anglicans engaging emerging church & mission.

I have no idea what that means but there is more:

Anglimergent is a ‘big tent’ community of diverse Anglicans…..

Once you join Anglimergent, we invite you go to the ‘GROUPS PAGE’ and join your NATIONAL CHURCH and also your DIOCESAN GROUP. – If your national church (TEC, CofE, ACC…) or your diocese does not have a group, start one! – This way our Anglimergent conversation is ‘glocal’ – across national churches and diocese (global) AND specific to work within your own Anglican church body and your own diocese (local). Cheers and welcome aboard.

As you can see, this section has managed to include two mangled words in one sentence: Anglimergent conversation is glocal. I assume this is some kind of entrance test: only Anglicans who are not acutely repulsed by words like Anglimergent and glocal should apply. Having weeded out all others, what will be left? A ‘big tent’ community of diverse Anglicans, presumably; I fear we are back to the floating feculence.

Diocese of Niagara does Diversity Training for Lent

The training helps us understand our “otherness”, apparently. I don’t think I need it since I already appreciate my “otherness” from the Diocese of Niagara and am profoundly grateful for it.

From here:

Diversity Training- Understanding Our Otherness

With Maureen Brown, principal of Diveristy Trainers Plus. Maureen believes that at heart most people want the conversation on human diversity to be an honest one leading to the best results for all. As founder and principal of DiversityTrainersPlus, she helps people to have such conversations as she equips them to maximize the benefits of diversity in their environment. A former journalist, Maureen cuts through the jargon and misconceptions about diversity and inclusion with clarity and forthrightness.

I’m almost tempted to attend just so that I can learn to cut through jargon as effectively as Maureen. It would equip me to maximise the benefits of diversity in my conversation…. or environment… or something.