Author Archives: David

Keeping abreast of other news

Posted on by
1

It takes a lot for Oakville to make the headlines in international news.

And in September 2022 there was, indeed, a lot on display in a local high school. A transgender teacher, who seems to want to give a new slant to the “T” in transgender, appeared on Snapchat wearing giant prosthetic breasts.

Unsurprisingly, many parents were not happy about this: there were protests, demands that the teacher be fired, and claims the teacher is sexualizing children.

The Halton School Board has been deflecting all demands that they do something about this – enforce a dress code, for example. Now, finally, the Board has come up with an answer: they can’t do anything because it would violate Canada’s Human Rights Code, it would be discriminatory and non-inclusive. And the board might get sued.

Is this all an elaborate hoax, as some think? An ingenious advertisement promoting home-schooling? Or a sign that our civilisation is flushing itself down the toilet with ever increasing vigour and enthusiasm?

Read it all here:

Many challenges face employers wanting to implement staff dress codes and chances are, should they try, the policy would fail.

That was the bottom line as Sari Taha, the Halton District School Board’s superintendent of human resources, described for trustees the legal complexities in instituting a staff dress code, at the Nov. 9 meeting of the board.

Motivating trustees to seek clarification on such a policy was the global uproar and parental outrage that followed an Oakville transgender high school teacher’s overtly sexual classroom attire. One of the strongest complaints from the community was the board’s lack of a dress code for staff.

There are major challenges the board would face in instituting a dress code: the dress code must be compliant with the Human Rights Code; and dress codes adversely impact women and other groups disproportionately, often leading to discrimination claims and rendering policies unenforceable, he said.

Canadian Primate claims Nigeria, Uganda and Rwanda have separated from the Anglican Communion

Posted on by
11

Archbishop Linda Nicholls stated in an email to the Anglican Journal that provinces that did not attend the latest Lambeth conference have “separated from the Anglican Communion”.

Does she mean by this that Anglicans in Nigeria, Uganda and Rwanda are fake Anglicans, pale imitations of the genuine article?

When Canadian Anglicans left the Anglican Church of Canada for the Southern Cone and later formed ANiC, this was the claim explicitly made by ACoC clergy, so it is not unreasonable to conclude that Nicholls it is implying this. The fact that the provinces that did not attend Lambeth have full, vibrant churches while liberal western Anglicanism is little more than a twitching corpse whose nervous system is still functioning but has disconnected from any resemblance of sentience does not bother the archbishop. One almost gets the impression she is glad to see the back of these troublesome conservative provinces.

The other interpretation is that liberal western Anglicanism “separated from the Anglican Communion” some years ago by abandoning orthodox Christianity. Not only is it an Anglican fake, but a Christian fake.

From here:

The Anglican churches in Nigeria, Uganda and Rwanda have effectively separated from the Anglican Communion by refusing to participate in the Lambeth Conference, says Archbishop Linda Nicholls, primate of the Anglican Church of Canada.

Like many other Canadian bishops, however, Nicholls also says she left this summer’s meeting in Lambeth, U.K. with a prevailing sense of hope for the future of the Communion.

About 650 bishops attended this summer’s Lambeth Conference, a gathering of Anglican bishops from around the world which last met in 2008. Much media coverage of the conference focused on disagreement over same-sex marriage, particularly after primates of Nigeria, Rwanda and Uganda refused to attend in protest at the invitation of bishops in same-sex unions. The same three provinces had already boycotted the 2008 gathering—attending a meeting of conservative bishops, the Global Anglican Futures Conference, in Jerusalem instead—as well as the meeting of Anglican Communion primates in March 2022.

Reached via email, Nicholls said the Lambeth boycott is a sign those provinces have left the global grouping of Anglican churches.

“Some have already indicated by their non-participation that they have separated from the Anglican Communion,” she said, confirming she meant the provinces of Nigeria, Rwanda and Uganda. “Others continue to participate despite disagreement and I see that continuing into the future.”

Anglicans in heat

Posted on by
3

What happens when a church ceases to believe in the transcendent, in heaven, in hell, when its god shrinks to manageable dimensions, when the hereafter is less important than the here-and-now?

It becomes obsessed – in those rare moments when it isn’t exploring the nether regions of homoerotic fantasies – with climate change.

Saving souls from overheating now is more important than in eternity.

As the headline trumpets: “Climate change tops agenda at WCC Assembly, say Canadian delegates”.

From the Journal:

Climate change tops agenda at WCC Assembly, say Canadian delegates

The top concern of this year’s World Council of Churches (WCC) Assembly was unquestionably climate change, says Canon Scott Sharman, the Anglican Church of Canada’s animator for ecumenical and interfaith relations.

The assembly also released statements on issues of reconciliation and unity, the war between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict between Israel and Palestine. But Sharman says the amount of discussion on climate change; the way it cropped up throughout plenary sessions on other topics, like racism and Indigenous issues; and even a march for environmental justice organized by delegates to the assembly all served to stress one central theme. In the words of a statement the WCC delegates released on the meeting’s last day, “We are running out of time. This Assembly is the last chance we have to act together to prevent the planet from becoming uninhabitable. In particular, no further delay is possible if we are to have any chance of staying within the safer limit of +1.5°C global warming and of avoiding vastly more catastrophic climate change.”

With the WCC only meeting every eight years, says Sharman, he and other attendees felt a sense of urgency to come together on an effective response.

Beatitudes for National Coming Out Day

Posted on by
1

Not only do we have a National Coming Out Day, but it has its own beatitudes.

I was unaware of both until the Diocese of Huron – always a reliable source for the most delusional fantasies cherished by the looniest fringes that lurk on the outskirts of what is left of our civilisation – advertised the fact:


For those of you for whom the original Sermon on the Mount is just not out enough, here are the rest of them:

October 20th is International Pronouns Day

Posted on by
10

I don’t know about you, but I’ve been looking forward to celebrating this all year. Casting such trivia as chromosomes into the dustbin of useless outdated science, there’s no better icebreaker at an Alpha meeting than to say – as I am now a fully integrated Canadian – “hi, my name’s Cuthbert and I use ey/em pronouns, eh”. It’ll be a riot.

The Diocese of Huron has this helpful guide on when a they is a ney and a him is a nem (page 8):

October 20 is International Pronouns Day. This day seeks to make respecting, sharing, and educating about personal pronouns commonplace. Referring to people by the pronouns they determine for themselves is basic to human dignity – it is about respecting and honouring people for who they are – in fullness. It is about breaking down the gender binary, stereotypes, and assumptions – and hearing people for who they are and the language that feels right for them. It is about celebrating the diversity of God as emulated through God’s diverse children.

The most common pronouns are she/her and he/him. Additionally, the most common gender neutral pronoun is they/them – this has been used as a singular pronoun since as far back as 1375 – so it is certainly not new! For example, rather than saying: “He and I went to the store”, you would say: “They and I went to the store”. It also helps avoid the awkwardness of saying “I can’t wait to meet him or her!” – instead, you can simply say: “I can’t wait to meet them!” There are many pronouns beyond she/her, he/him, and they/them – this includes mixed pronouns (when people use multiple different sets of pronouns, such as “she/her and they/them”), and neopronouns (other sets of gender-neutral pronouns, such as ney/nem, ze/zi, ey/em, etc).

Anglican Church of Canada does not oppose euthanasia

Posted on by
4

It is legal for a doctor to euthanise a person in Canada. Not just someone whose death is imminent, but also a person with a mental disorder who has decided – or been persuaded – that is it better to die than live. The ACoC is going along with this because it is not interested in “opposing the law”. In the Anglican Church of Canada, we call this being prophetic.

And, after all, abortion up to and during birth, prostitution and smoking marijuana are also all legal and the Anglican Church of Canada doesn’t oppose them either. So at least its consistent. Consistently cowardly, spiritually bankrupt and in thrall to the zeitgeist.

From here:

The Anglican Church of Canada should continue to focus on providing pastoral care to people who are considering medical assistance in dying (MAID), not on opposing the law, says Archbishop Linda Nicholls, primate of the Anglican Church of Canada.

Bill C-7, passed in March 2021, opened up the option for patients whose deaths are not imminent—and, as of next March, those suffering only from mental disorders—to seek MAID, attracting some controversy. As the Journal reported in the first part of this series, some advocates for the rights of people with disabilities have criticized it on the grounds that it offers death as a replacement for adequate care. (See “Justice and the new assisted death”) And at least two authors of In Sure and Certain Hope, a 2016 document offered as a resource for discussions around MAID, believe the bill raises questions which may require a new response from the church.

But any new response by the church is unlikely to involve taking a public stance on the law, Nicholls says.

“It’s been clear for some time that the mood in Canada [is] not … to consider what churches have to say about this,” she says. “It’s been seen as imposing Christian values—which I think is a little unfair, as I don’t think all of the arguments have been based on a faith perspective.” Meanwhile, the shrinking staff of the church’s national office has limited capacity to take on a question of this size, she adds, especially as the law, in her view, is a “fait accompli.”

A Lambeth group LBGTQ photo

Posted on by
3

You can spot Canada’s very own Bishop Kevin Robertson, who is married to another bloke, on the far right.

I admit, they do make a charming group, but what continues to puzzle me is sorting out which is a G, a B or a Q – I think I have the Ls.

And that’s just the beginning of the problem, because we also have 2, S, 2s, P, A, I, and + to deal with. Although I suppose + must include the rest of us, which only makes it even more confusing since the group photo should really have been of all the bishops.

If you think that’s mixed up, it’s about to get worse. Lesbians have gone to war with transgenders, so they will have to be split up in the next Lambeth group photo, or they’ll be hitting each other with their handbags.

Anglicans in the Ottawa Pride parade

Posted on by
4

The Anglican obsession with homo-eroticism is hardly news of course, nevertheless, here are some Anglicans in the recent Ottawa Pride parade:

What is beginning to change is the further indoctrination of children by initiating them into the whole sordid business. Here, in the same parade, is a drag queen teaching children to imitate the repulsive gyrating contortions that seem to pass for dancing these days. Unless I am missing something, this is the blatant sexualization of children, child abuse, potential grooming for nightmarish paedophilia and unabashedly demonic.

Click on image to play video

[fvplayer id=”23″]

The bishop of Ottawa, Shane Parker, seems to have no problem having his clergy participate in this evil fiasco, making him, his organisation and clergy just as repugnantly wicked  as the drag queen in the video.

Lambeth 2022: the bigger elephant in the room

Posted on by
3

Just Welby really didn’t want to talk about sex at the recent Lambeth gathering; specifically homosexual sex. It was his elephant in the room: everyone knew it was there, the global south bishops wanted to talk about it and Welby wished it would just go away. Instead, he wanted to talk about: Safe Church; Anglican Identity; Reconciliation; Human Dignity; Environment and Sustainable Development; Christian Unity; Inter Faith Relations; Discipleship; Science and Faith and Mission and Evangelism.

I left Mission and Evangelism until last for reasons that will become clear in a moment. As for the rest, they are all empty platitudes; they sound good, but no one is going to take them seriously. No one is interested in what a gathering of bishops thinks about the environment. The Anglican church is powerless to change the environment, or to develop sustainable energy. It can’t bring itself to reconcile with ACNA or ANiC, the average bishop knows as much about climatology or science as my cat and interfaith relations with Islam will end up being about as rosy as it was between Salman Rushdie and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

The one thing that Justine Welby did have the authority to address, he chose not to: the continuing controversy of homosexual clergy and same-sex marriage in the Anglican Church of Canada and The Episcopal Church. That was the small elephant.

That brings us to Mission and Evangelism, which is, according to Lambeth:

Each diocese and every church should commit to prayer and listening guided by the Holy Spirit to discern how to bear faithful witness to Christ and authentically proclaim the gospel. Each Christian should strive through their witness for at least one person each year to come to faith and grow as a disciple. The Secretary General should support and monitor progress and report back to the Anglican Consultative Council.

What is missing is that nowhere does anyone say what “the gospel” is. Is it caring for the environment? Apologising for our ancestors who owned slaves? Presenting an appearance of unity? Planting trees? Promoting socialism? Violating the laws of logic by holding two proposition which cannot both be true as equally valid; after all, what is truth – hang on didn’t someone else say that?

As far as I know no bishop came within hailing distance of declaring that we are all sinners; our sin separates us from God the Father; if there is justice in this universe, we deserve the judgement of a holy God; we can do nothing ourselves to remedy this; in spite of this, God still loves us; Jesus paid the price for our sin, receiving our punishment upon himself; all who trust Jesus are given the free gift of forgiveness and eternal life. That is the Good News, the Gospel. Did any of the 600 or so bishops mention this? Did they forget? Does it embarrass them?

My suspicion is that most of them (we’ll exclude the global south bishops) don’t believe that this is the Gospel – and that is the real problem, the bigger elephant in the room.