Anglican clergy expel endless volumes of hot air on climate change, racism, mosquito nets, universal basic income, gender-based violence – and so on. Nothing about Jesus, salvation, eternity, heaven and hell, of course, but we’ll save that for another time. They would like you to think that these weighty temporal predicaments occupy every minute of their waking thoughts. It’s not true. What really excites the average Anglican bishop is sex. They can’t get enough of it – particularly the homoerotic variety. When sex is on the agenda, the climate can boil for all they care.
There are so many bishops foaming at the mouth in horror at the very, very small possibility that they may be asked to consider that the only legitimate form of marriage is between a man and a woman, that it would waste terabytes of bandwidth to list them – so I will confine myself to some Canadian bishops:
Here is the statement from Bishop Susan Bell:
I know there has been concern over the proposed reaffirmation of Lambeth Resolution 1.10. Please be assured that in our discussions, in our fellowship, and in our conclusions, I will bear witness to the many decisions we have made in the Diocese of Niagara to embrace equal marriage and uphold the dignity of every human being.
And here is the statement from the Diocese of Edmonton’s Bishop Stephen London:
I do have to say I was extremely disappointed to see in the resolution about Human Dignity that there is a call to reaffirm Lambeth resolution I.10, from 1998, which is against marriage equality for our LGBTQ+ community. This goes against what I thought we were doing in speaking where we find we have a common mind as a communion. It is clear that there is no common mind on this issue
Here is Sam Rose, bishop of Eastern Newfoundland and Labrador:
And here is Todd Townshend, Bishop of the Diocese of Huron (click on the image to read it more clearly):
And last (for the moment), but not least, Anna Greenwood-Lee, Bishop of the Diocese of BC:
To anticipate the objection that this is all about love – it isn’t, it’s about sex.
If the homosexual clergy in the Anglican church simply loved other men but either did not want or had no intention of having sex with them, none of this would be being discussed. Lambeth resolution 1.10 would not have been written, the communion would not be divided, GAFCON and ACNA would not exist.
It is all about sex; clergy who deny this are trying to deceive you.
More precisely, it’s about impersonal male orgasm, and privileging that.
That both the Roman and the Anglican Communions find themselves avoiding the ‘s’ word – both sins and crimes pertaining thereto – is TRC proof positive, yet to be fully confirmed in the still un-rendered records, that they were committed and perpetrated.
Why else the sounds of silence while these Baal cabals, enemies of righteousness who cease not to pervert the right ways of The LORD, are forcing as the mind of both global Churches and the faithful among their Communions into accepting as dignified these same Scriptural sins?
Remedial or not that the Prime Minister, Roman Catholic, in Quebec City on July 27, in official attendance upon both The Pope and Canada’s Governor General, made the very first mention of his Government of “sexual abuse”: while his Regime has been on all fronts, inclusive of access to Federal employment, the chief purveyor of sexual sin, homosexual par excellence – desecrating our Nation’s flag for it;
all this, 2015 – 2022….. on the pain of criminalization for any verbal/printed or other active opposition to said benighted policies and their equally unjust punishment.
At his Penitential Pilgrimage in Quebec City, July 28, 2022, The Pope, for the first time, identified “sexual” abuse in addition to the other four sins and/or crimes identified in his official Apology offered on Monday, July 26, in Alberta.
Now “Truth” – all of it – has met “Reconciliation”.