Downsizing the Anglican Church of Canada

“Downsizing” in business is a euphemism for laying people off; it is a deliberate exercise to cut expenses by paying fewer workers; it is usually a survival tactic. In the Anglican church of Canada, “downsizing” seems to be taking the form of consolidating dioceses – and, presumably, laying off employees – because the church has lost many of its customers. As in business, the ACoC is downsizing in order to survive. Whether it should survive is probably a more interesting question than how to make it survive but we’ll get to that in a moment.

Another euphemism adored by business is “global resourcing”. This is code for sending jobs overseas to places where labour is cheap, places like India, Argentina, Brazil, China and so on, and laying off workers where labour is expensive – like North America – in order to make cheaper goods and increase profits. It’s a shame that the Anglican Church of Canada isn’t considering global resourcing – to Africa, for example – instead of downsizing. There would be two benefits:

African Anglicans know how to make churches grow; this is mainly because – to use a business illustration again – unlike their North American counterparts, they actually believe in what they are selling.

African Anglicans would turn the ACoC into something that might be worth saving rather than what we have now: a weekly pantomime of largely effeminate priests in fancy dress engaging in an aesthetic posturing whose underlying meaning was abandoned around the turn of the 20th century. They would turn it into something that should be saved, something that God would bless.

From here:

The lean-and-mean sort of downsizing that has marked corporate Canada of late may be poised to affect the ecclesiastical province of Canada—reducing the number of its dioceses so it can carry out God’s mission more efficiently.

Delegates to the September 2012 provincial synod will consider this possibility as one of several motions from the province’s governance task force aimed at reforming church structures to enhance mission.

According to a background note to the notice of motion, the proposal “recognizes the changing demographic of the Anglican Church within the ecclesiastical province of Canada in terms of both decreasing numbers and the increased cost of providing ecclesiastical services within our seven existing dioceses.”

The province comprises the country’s seven easternmost dioceses: Montreal, Quebec, Fredericton, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island; and Western Newfoundland, Central Newfoundland and Eastern Newfoundland and Labrador.

A new configuration might see these dioceses merged into three: Montreal with Quebec; Fredericton with Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island; and all three dioceses of Newfoundland and Labrador: Western, Central and Eastern.

What Anglican bishops do on Good Friday

Pontificate on oil pipelines:

From here:

Six Anglican bishops from across British Columbia and Yukon came together on Good Friday in a call for the environ-mental review hearings on the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline to remain fair and free from political pressure.

“There’s some concern that the decision’s already been made and that the review process is just a rubber stamp,” said Bishop Michael Ingham, of the Diocese of New West-minster. “I think what we’re trying to do is call upon the panel itself to resist pressure – political pressure, industry pressure – and to come to a fair, balanced and thorough set of recommendations.”

Ingham signed the statement, which he said was prompted by bishops being inundated with concern for the process from members of their dioceses.

Rather than build a pipeline in Canada, I am quite sure that the six bishops would prefer oil revenues continue to flow to Middle Eastern countries who subjugate women, hang homosexuals and persecute Christians – much less environmental damage.

African bishops coming to Canada to “to engage in building better relationships”

From here:

This June, close to 20 bishops from Africa, the United States and Canada will converge on Toronto to engage in building better relationships between national churches.

They are part of a gathering called the Consultation of Anglican Bishops in Dialogue, a rather fluid group that had its origins in the 2008 Lambeth Conference.

At the time, there were tensions between the churches over same-sex relationships, and Archbishop Colin Johnson hosted a fringe event for some African and Canadian bishops that focused on mission in a post-colonial world.

In addition to Archbishop Johnson, the Canadian contingent will comprise Bishop Michael Bird of Niagara, Bishop Michael Ingham of New Westminster, Bishop Terry Dance, suffragan bishop of Huron, and Bishop Janet Alexander of Edmonton.

Meanwhile, Bishops Bird and Ingham are striving to build their very own better relationships with former parishioners who fled to ANiC, by taking over their buildings through litigation. I don’t suppose that will be something they will hold up to the African bishops as a sterling example of  “how to mend relations”, though.

General Secretary of the World Council of Churches to visit Canada

From here:

On March 13, the Rev. Dr. Olav Fykse Tveit, General Secretary of the World Council of Churches (WCC), will visit General Synod offices to learn about the full communion relationship between the Anglican Church of Canada (ACC) and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada (ELCIC).

I could have saved, the Rev. Dr. Olav Fykse Tveit the airfare.

Olav, the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada have both succumbed to a rampant liberalism which has, by and large, displaced any pretensions they might have once had of being Christian. Consequently, they are losing members, money and credibility: they can’t even afford to have independent synods and are considering sharing office space.

So it’s understandable that they would want coordinate their efforts to flush themselves down the toilet of theological liberalism. It’s not only an act of pious ecumenism, but it’s green – less water.

The Anglican Church of Canada appoints a special government advisor

“Special government advisor” is an odd title since it seems to imply that the Canadian government is seeking advice from the Anglican Church; I know we are in difficult financial times, but surely Ottawa is not that desperate.

The Rev. Laurette Gauthier Glasgow will agitate for “peace and justice” in the form, I imagine, of the Millennium Development Goals.

When she was assistant rector of All Saints, Belgium, she was already eager to advise the government on how to govern:

Let us encourage governments, business leaders, and members of civil society to be inspired by our more dynamic concept of abundance. As they seek to reform the global system and address global challenges, may they find true abundance in the midst of need so that we might eradicate need in the midst of abundance.

One presumes that the Belgian government was not entirely receptive to Rev. Glasgow’s “encouragement”, so now she is going to give the Canadian government the benefit of her insights. This doesn’t have much to do with the gospel of the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ, of course, but there is little left in the Anglican Church of Canada that does.

From here:

The Rev. Laurette Gauthier Glasgow has been appointed Special Advisor for Government Relations for the Anglican Church of Canada (The General Synod and the Diocese of Ottawa) while also continuing as Incumbent for the Parish of St. James, Leitrim, in the Diocese of Ottawa.

In a joint announcement, Archbishop Fred Hiltz, Primate of the Anglican Church of Canada, and Bishop John Chapman of Ottawa, expressed delight in co-sponsoring this half-time position that responds to a long-standing desire on the part of the church to establish a government relations presence in Ottawa. This was also a key recommendation from Vision 2019, endorsed at General Synod 2010.

 

A parishioner who disbelieves in the Resurrection asks if he should stay in the Anglican Church of Canada

Angus Hamilton doesn’t believe that God is a trinity of persons, doesn’t believe in the supernatural, the Resurrection, the after-life, heaven and hell or that the Bible is God’s written revelation to man.

This has driven him to wonder whether he should leave the Anglican Church of Canada. Angus, if your fear is that you may feel out of place if you continue in the Anglican Church of Canada, rest assured, you will fit right in.

From here (page 1):

“I believe in a God of the Universe who created the laws of physics and chemistry and the processes that have enabled life to evolve and to continue evolving on planet earth.

“I don’t believe in a personal God, in an old avuncular figure who created the world and all that is in it about 7,000 years ago.

“I believe the Bible is a valuable book of wisdom to be read as all great literature is read, – as stories that convey an important message.

“I don’t believe that the Bible is literally true. “I believe that the idea of heaven and hell was conceived by a tribal leader who couldn’t otherwise persuade his tribe to do what he thought they should do, and that it has been widely used in governance ever since.

“I don’t believe in an after-life, in heaven and hell. “I believe there is a higher power that mankind does not yet understand, just as it did not understand electromagnetic radiation until about 300 years ago. “I don’t believe in the supernatural. Thus there is much in the Bible, including the resurrection story, that I do not believe. “I believe in the teachings of Jesus that can definitely be attributed to him.

“I don’t believe that everything in the Bible attributed to Jesus was said or done by him.

“I believe that the concept of ‘Church’ is important, and that a quite different form of church will evolve.

“I don’t believe that the established churches can continue with ‘business as usual.’”

St. George's Anglican Church, Montreal to receive government hand-out

From here:

Media Advisory: Government of Canada to Announce Support to St. George’s Anglican Church National Historic Site

MONTREAL, QUEBEC, Feb 21, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) — On behalf of the Honourable Peter Kent, Canada’s Environment Minister and Minister responsible for Parks Canada, the Honourable Judith Seidman, Senator, will make an infrastructure announcement regarding the conservation and presentation of the St. George’s Anglican Church National Historic Site.

St. George’s, is an historic site and will be a recipient of government largesse; to put it another way, taxpayers will pay for its upkeep.

I’m not averse to paying for the upkeep of an historically or aesthetically significant building, but there is a degree of irony in a church degenerating to this status: the activity for which it was built – housing worshipping Christians – can no longer attract enough people to pay for its upkeep. Or, more correctly, the Anglican Church of Canada’s confused, sub-Christian concoction of neo-paganism and eco-cultism is not attracting enough people.

The irony is reinforced by that fact that the Anglican Church of Canada has recently spent a great deal of money on lawsuits to wrest the ownership of buildings for which it has no use and can’t afford to maintain from those who could both use and maintain them.

How long before Bishop Michael Ingham declares St. John’s Shaughnessy an historic site worthy of taxpayer support? It’s running a deficit of $20,000 per month at the moment.

The 39 articles, Readers’ Digest version

From here:

The Executive Council of the Episcopal Church issued the following message at the conclusion of its three-day meeting in Linthicum Heights, Maryland

A Message from Executive Council
January 29, 2012
Linthicum Heights, Maryland

God is awesome
The Good News is not fair
God always acts first

So there you have it: the Anglican Credo circa 2012, the 39 articles in a shrunken trivial trinity, a tertiary triteness, a bromidic banality, a diabolical dephlegmation.

Or perhaps it’s so profound, I missed the point and should repeat it:

God is awesome
The Good News is not fair
God always acts first

I might set it to music to see if that helps.

Advocacy Charities

From here:

 There was a time when being a charity meant doing something real, something tangible.

Operating a soup kitchen.

Providing medical help to those in need overseas.

Helping orphans here in Canada.

Providing valuable goods or services.

That’s real charity work.

No longer.

Now it appears that hyper-political lobbying can count as charitable work too.

Yes, you can be a full-time whiner, and that counts as charity work!

This isn’t intended to be a description of the Anglican Church of Canada, but it is an apt characterisation:

The Social Justice and Advocacy Committee is organizing groups of Anglicans to meet with their newly elected and re-elected MPPs in the next few months to build positive relationships and discuss ways of advancing progress on the critical issues of poverty, hunger and affordable housing facing our society.

 

Going to church lowers your blood pressure

From here:

Going to church at Christmas may have been good for the soul, but scientists have discovered that it may also be good for the body.

Researchers found that attending services lowers blood pressure – and the more often you go the lower it becomes.

Unless, that is, you belong to the Anglican Church of Canada and are an unwitting recipient of the Anglican Journal, in which case, if you are a Christian, articles like this will undoubtedly increase your blood pressure:

As for the New Testament, Spong rejects the 4th-century Augustinian interpretation of Christ the Redeemer of sinners. Christ should be reconstrued not as “the divine invader but as the human life who broke through consciousness to a new level of understanding, and people perceive that as the presence of God in him. A hundred years from now I’m quite sure that view will be almost universal.”

In his non-theistic universe, Christianity is about expanded life, heightened consciousness and achieving a new humanity. “I am tired of seeing the Bible being used, as it has been throughout history, to legitimize slavery and segregation, to subdue women, to punish homosexuals, to justify war and to oppose family planning and birth control.” For him, that is a perversion and travesty that must be challenged and changed.