Why are atheists angry?

It is strange that the members of the group that trumpets its appeal to reason alone for the explanation of why we are here, are inclined to share the characteristic of being irrationally angry.

Long gone are the days of enjoyable gentlemen’s debates, full of reasoned intensity and intellectual rigour – such as those between Bertrand Russell and Fr. Copplestone. Perhaps it is partly because  they lack the mental equipment of their predecessors or perhaps there is a deeper psychological reason, but today’s Dawkins/Hitchens spawned atheists seem more inclined to rage against a God whom they insist isn’t there.

Sometimes the anger is easily explained by the psychological problems of emotional reasoning, immaturity  and low frustration tolerance, but assertions such as those of Hitchens that God, if he existed, would be a “celestial dictator” or of Dawkins that God in the Old Testament is a “sex-obsessed, cruel tyrant” point to the uneasy suspicion that the new atheists disbelieve in God less than they hate him.

Perhaps, then, the explanation is that the new atheists share a common tendency for self-destruction: the impulse to self-destruction leads to a life of learning hatred for the Decider of eternal destinies and is expressed in the angry bravado of rebellion. Come to think of it, there is nothing new about that.

The Templeton Prize

The Templeton prize is supposed to honour someone who:

has made an exceptional contribution to affirming life’s spiritual dimension, whether through insight, discovery, or practical works.

This year, the winner was Martin Rees, an astrophysicist at Cambridge University who “has no religious beliefs”, but occasionally attends Church of England Sunday worship – where he fits right in.

It might be possible for this to be more mixed up, but so far we have Rees who doesn’t believe in God, but attends an Anglican Church sporadically, winning a prize for making an “exceptional contribution to affirming life’s spiritual dimension”.

But wait, there’s more: real atheists like Richard Dawkins reckon he’s let the side down by “blur[ring] the boundary between science and religion, making a virtue of belief without evidence”. Meanwhile, Dawkins continues to believe, without evidence*, that the excogitations of the grey soup beneath his thinning curly locks are of a weightier substance than Mr Gumby’s flower arranging instructions.

* J. B. S. Haldane: “If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to suppose that my beliefs are true…. and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms”

Turning Lent into a political exercise

And nobody does it better than Evangelical Leftist, Jim Wallis who has gone on a “water fast” to protest government budget cuts.

I wondered where that smell was coming from.

From here:

Yesterday morning, Tony Hall, David Beckmann, Ritu Sharma, and I began a water fast because of what I call “selectively cruel” budget cuts aimed at our most important poverty-fighting programs. The room at the National Press Club was full, and we all felt great support from the many hunger, poverty, and faith-inspired activists gathered there.

The return of Commodore

I still have an Amiga 3000 buried in my antique computer graveyard in the basement – unless my wife found it, concluded its decomposing carcass was junk and threw it out – and now, as a reminder of the Halcyon days of display lists, blitters and 6800 assembler code, Commodore has risen from the ashes with new versions of the 64, VIC-20 and Amiga.

They are not the real thing, of course: their processors are Intel, graphics Nvidia and OS Linux.

Still, a pleasant nostalgia moment.

Evolutionary Newspeak

From here:

The anti-ID biologist Richard Dawkins once said, “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” Now some ID critics today are so fearful of lending any credence towards intelligent design that they are recommending that biologists stop using the word “design” entirely.

A recent article in the journal Bioessays by its editor Andrew Moore, titled “We need a new language for evolution. . . everywhere,” suggests that biologists should stop using the term “design.” According to Moore, under “Evolution old-speak” we would say, “Structure X is designed to perform…” but under “Evolution new-speak” we must simply say, “Structure X performs Y.”

This means that, since Richard Dawkins’ head isn’t designed to hold his ears six inches apart but merely performs the function of doing so, it is an even less important organ that I first thought.

A Bell of a blunder

It’s not often that Christian speculation on the reality and nature of Hell merits a spot in the secular press, but Rob Bell, pastor of the extremely successful Mars Hill church, has managed just that. He seems to be shocked by all the attention his ruminations are receiving.

Here is the CBC’s coverage. Rob Bell seems increasingly more interested in building a temporal kingdom of heaven than in occupying an eternal one, a malaise that is more commonly associated with liberal mainline churches.

Evangelical megachurch pastor Rob Bell told a Nashville audience he did not anticipate the firestorm he would stir with his book that questions the traditional Christian belief that a select number of believers will spend eternity in heaven while everyone else is tormented in hell.

Bell said that he not only didn’t set out to be controversial, he had no idea his bestseller, Love Wins, would bring condemnation from people like Southern Baptist Seminary President Albert Mohler, who claims Bell is leading people astray.

“The last couple of weeks have been the most painful in my life,” the Michigan pastor told a crowd of about 1,600 at Belmont University in Nashville Tuesday after an audience member asked him about the criticism he has faced.

“It has taken me to a place of profound brokenness,” he said…..

He said that what he called “evacuation theology,” or the idea that “Jesus is your ticket to somewhere else,” is dangerous because it can cause people to miss Christ’s message about how to live in such harmony with God that you are creating a heaven on Earth.

“Jesus taught his disciples to pray, not ‘God, beam me up,’ but ‘Thy will be done on Earth as it is in heaven,”‘ Bell said.

He says hell is something freely chosen that already exists on Earth.

Mars Hill has attempted damage control by publishing a Love Wins FAQ, but seeing Rob Bell giving evasive answers to direct questions in this interview hasn’t helped:

Church of England, the Burger King of Christianity

From here:

Getting married? Have it your way, says Church of England.

Just weeks before the royal wedding of Will and Kate, the Church of England has a new video on its wedding website. You can wed at a magnificent church as easy as ordering a fast food burger — your way. And you don’t even have to be Christian.

By lowering the entrance qualifications to zero, the Church of England is trying to attract people who are looking for nothing but pretty buildings and grinning, compliant vicars.

Which parish will be the first to offer a drive-through lane?

A bible for atheists

Atheist, A. C. Grayling has written a book giving fellow atheists advice on ways to live a good life. Other than as an act of sheer hubris, giving advice on a commodity – goodness – which has no meaning for atheists seems particularly pointless. If atheism is true, the moral actions of humans are entirely predetermined by evolution, including Grayling’s writing of this superfluous book.

From here:

In The Good Book, Professor Grayling attempts to whisk together in one tome the wisdom of Ancient Greek philosophers, Confucian sages, medieval poets and the discoveries of modern science.

Without any reference to gods, souls or afterlives, it aims to give atheists a book of inspiration and guidance as they make their way in the world.

In place of the more well-known Ten Commandments, his atheist principles are: “Love well, seek the good in all things, harm no others, think for yourself, take responsibility, respect nature, do your utmost, be informed, be kind, be courageous.”

Professor Grayling, the president elect of the British Humanist Association, is unambivalent about the biblical mission of his work.

“The point about the religious bible is that it purports to give us some direction. It contains the commands of a divinity wishing us to live a certain way,” he says.

“In fact it has a message which is that there is one great truth and one right way to live.

“The modest offering of The Good Book is that there are as many good lives as there are people who have the talent to live them, and that people must take the responsibility for thinking for themselves and making that decision for themselves.

“What this book does is try and offer them resources for thinking about that.”

How to allocate blame

Based on the principle that no-one committing a crime should be exonerated simply because they have been provoked, the police are under fire for telling women not to dress like sluts if they don’t want to be raped.

Based on the principle that no-one committing a crime should be exonerated simply because they have been provoked – unless they are Muslims, that is – Terry Jones is responsible for the murder of 20 Afghans.