The United Church of Canada really does hate Israel

What other conclusion can one draw from the cockamamie responses in this interview:

Q&A: Why United Church activists are targeting Israel:

Q Your task force has 15 members and you say that the boycott expresses the will of the 60 congregations in your church region. How do you know it reflects the views of those 7,000 members in those congregations?

A A corporation doesn’t have all its policies approved by all their shareholders, do they? We did not go to every single individual and every single congregation, but we’re a body of the United Church that has the authority to make these decisions and we did that.

Q Has the national church ­endorsed what you’re doing?

A The national church has not endorsed this campaign, but it hasn’t unendorsed it either.

Q What other countries are you targetting for boycotts?

A We’re active in a whole bunch of issues.

Q But what other boycotts have you called for?

A Oh, boycotts. Well, not necessarily boycotts at this point. But this is a long entrenched problem and boycotts have been called for against Israel by civil society in many other countries.

Q But I am wondering what other boycotts your group has called for or been involved with.

A We have participated in other boycott campaigns. In South Africa we participated during the era of apartheid.

Q That was a while ago. What oppressive regimes have you called for boycotts against since then? There are many oppressive regimes in Africa and the Middle East. Or what about communist China?

A No, we have not.

Q So why a boycott of Israel?

A Number one, because Israel purports to be a democracy. Number two, they are in violation of international law and even the UN has tried to call Israel to account. So what is left for people who want to see international law enforced? Libya just happened and the U.S. jumped to take on the presumed responsibility to protect civilians; they jumped in with all kinds of force. But they won’t do that against Israel ever because Israel purports to be a democracy.

Q You say five of the companies extract minerals from occupied land or exploit labour or is a supporter of the IDF. Does Indigo make books in Israel?

A Chapters Indigo owners [Heather] Reisman and [Gerald] Schwartz founded the HESEG foundation, which provides scholarships and other support to “lone soldiers” who have been in the Israeli military. [Lone soldiers are Jews who leave their home countries to join the Israeli army. They have no family in Israel, but often want to stay once their military service is done.]

Q Why would you boycott the company then? This is not the company doing this, but a couple as private citizens.

A I don’t know what to say to you. It’s not a purely private interest. They use the profits from their ownership from this huge company. They are supporting the occupation. This was the only way we could bring the light of day to how the profits of this company support this foundation.

Q Are you concerned that people think you’re fixated on Israel?

A This is not our only effort. We do anti-poverty work, we’ve lobbied about aboriginal rights and environmental issues.

Q But to be clear, you don’t target other countries.

A No.

 

Athens

While we were in Greece there was a one day strike which disrupted very little – for us, at least – and we saw some of the demonstrations in Athens; no violence, though. The locals we spoke to were sympathetic to the demonstrators but had no use for the rioters who, they were convinced, were imported professional agitators.

More Athens photos here.

 

The Acropolis

Add an Image

Add an Image

Add an Image

 

Mars Hill where St. Paul preached:

Add an Image

Street vendor:

Add an Image

 

Richard Dawkins is troubled by the fine tuning of the universe

From here:

Outspoken evangelical geneticist Francis Collins revealed that combative atheist Richard Dawkins admitted to him during a conversation that the most troubling argument for nonbelievers to counter is the fine-tuning of the universe.

“If they (constants in the universe) were set at a value that was just a tiny bit different, one part in a billion, the whole thing wouldn’t work anymore,” said Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, during the 31st Annual Christian Scholars’ Conference at Pepperdine University in Malibu, Calif.

These constants regarding the behavior of matter and energy – such as strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity, and the speed of light – have to be precisely right during the Big Bang for life as we know it to exist.

“To get our universe, with all of its potential for complexities or any kind of potential for any kind of life form, everything has to be precisely defined on this knife edge of improbability,” said the world renowned scientist.

“That forces a conclusion. If you are an atheist, either it is just a lucky break and the odds are so remote, or you have to go to this multiverse hypothesis, which says that there must be almost an infinite number of parallel universes that have different values of those constants,” explained Collins to Christian scholars of various disciplines in the audience. “And of course we are here and so we must have won the lottery, we must be in the one where everything worked.”

Ironically, employing the multiverse theory to explain the fine tuning of the universe requires more blind faith than belief in a Creator; yet it’s a faith that eminent scientists like Dawkins and Hawking are willing to embrace in their eagerness to avoid acknowledging that there really is a God.  The fact that the multiverse theory lacks empirical testability and is unfalsifiable, places it in the same category as  belief in fairies, a belief which Dawkins compares to religious faith and frequently enjoys deriding: such is the measure of his desperation to flee from God.

In other atheist news, Polly Toynbee will go where Dawkins fears to tread: into a debate with William Lane Craig. Toynbee doesn’t possess the intellectual equipment to avoid being trounced; it should be fun.

From here:

The President of the British Humanist Association (BHA), Polly Toynbee, is to debate the existence of God with eminent Christian philosopher William Lane Craig, when he visits the UK for a tour of speaking engagements in October.

Leading British atheists Richard Dawkins and A C Grayling have both declined the invitation to debate with Craig.

A new way for liberal denominations to make money

Erect cell phone towers on church property. This has two benefits: an influx of cash and irradiated parishioners emerge from church with a brightly glowing halo.

From here:

One more church, Roxboro United, has decided to allow Telus to erect a cell tower on its property, joining St. Barnabus Anglican Church, in a pitched battle against the city of Pierrefonds that is determined to prevent it.

Pierrefonds had threatened to fine or take legal action against St. Barnabus Church should it go ahead with plans for a Rogers cell tower on its property. City councillor Christian Dubois said the same policy would apply to Roxboro United. “We are the local authority and we can refuse to have cell towers erected,” said Dubois, who attended a recent Canadian Federation of Mayors conference in Halifax where he introduced a motion urging the federal government to re-evaluate its current cell tower policies. As it stands now, Canadian municipalities are caught in the middle of a federal regulation that involves Industry Canada and communications companies like Rogers and Telus.

Dubois, however, did add that if people in the area or the parishioners of either Roxboro United or St. Barnabus wanted the cell towers, then the city would support the decision. Which muddies the waters for both churches and the city of Pierrefonds as the congregations of both churches have given their support to the projects.

Erik Mathieson of the United Church of Canada in Toronto said there are no firm guidelines for churches wanting to have cell towers on their property but added that many churches are looking for additional revenue sources and cell companies know this. “Some churches are well-located for cell towers,” said Mathieson. “The general idea is to run the idea by the congregation, taking into account the safety concerns and the aesthetics of the tower.” He said cell tower installations are an “incremental” source of income for a church, bringing in anywhere from $5,000-$30,000 per year of the lease taken out. Mathieson admitted that some churches have balked at the idea of having a cell tower on site and that cell companies then move on.

 

Katharine Jefferts Schori given honorary doctorate by Huron University College

From here (page 5)

Bishop Jefferts Schori was in London to receive an honorary doctorate of divinity degree. Her visit to the Diocese began in the afternoon of May 4, 2012 at St. Paul’s Cathedral where Bishop Dance introduced her to Huron clergy who gathered to hear her thoughts on current issues facing the church. Bishop Jefferts Schori is a dynamic speaker with an artistic gift for listening that truly values the individual as well as the group.

Schori’s gift for listening and valuing the individual as well as the group is doubtless what has prompted her to take so many American Anglicans to court for trying to hold fast to the received faith and having the presumption of thinking the buildings they paid for belong to them.

The granddaughter of a former Huron college professor and bishop is not happy about Schori’s doctorate:

As a granddaughter of Bishop W.T. Hallam, in whose honour the Bishop Hallam Theological Society was named, I am deeply disappointed by the recent decision of the college to confer an honorary doctorate upon Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori at its upcoming convocation. It is sad to see such a clear sign of the degree to which Huron College has departed from the historic faith of the Anglican church, as represented in the 39 Articles, and as exemplified in my grandfather’s ministry throughout his life, and particularly in his last days as Professor and Dean of Divinity at Huron College, and Assistant Bishop of the Diocese of Huron. I am further saddened by the decision because I myself am a graduate of Huron College and enjoyed important years of my life there. As well, I am a lifelong Anglican, and continue to uphold the historic faith along with others in the midst of the current tide of theological confusion.

It is well known in our family that Grandad spent probably the happiest years of his life and ministry at Huron College and in the Diocese of Huron. It was because of this and also the remembrance of his name through the theological society that I had arranged with the college to donate papers of his now in my possession. I have now decided to entrust them to Wycliffe College, where the historic faith is still upheld, and the legacy of evangelical bishops in the Anglican church is likely to be of greater interest.

Although Wycliffe College is more theologically orthodox than the Diocese of Huron – after all, what isn’t? – it still has adopted a head-in-the-sand Neville Chamberlain attitude to the apostasy that is rife in the Anglican Church of Canada. Presumably because it is reluctant to bite the hand that feeds it.

Nigerian Anglican Primate to visit Canada and avoid Fred Hiltz

Hiltz will be deprived of the opportunity for conversation. Obviously the Nigerian Primate is on to him.

From here:

In what is being billed as an “historic moment”, the Archbishop of Nigeria Nicholas Okoh will visit Canada, but he will not see his counterpart, the Most Rev. Fred Hiltz, the Anglican Primate of Canada.

In what can only be described as a deliberate snub by the African Archbishop, the head of 20 million Nigerian Anglicans, Archbishop Okoh will visit some of his CANA (Convocation of Anglicans in North America) Churches in Canada between July 15 – 25th, 2011.

Gay Google Rainbows

Google has made a habit of celebrating homosexuality in June for a number of years. It does this by displaying a rainbow when the unsuspecting seeker after knowledge types words like “gay”:

 

I’m looking forward to Google celebrating Easter next year by displaying a cross when I type in Resurrection.

 

 

 

 

How to prove hell exists: try to get on an aeroplane

My wife and I arrived at Toronto airport a couple of weeks ago, knowing that the price one has to pay for a vacation is higher and more excruciating than merely parting with money.

The first obstacle that Air France mounted to prevent our boarding the flight was at the check-in counter:

Clerk: Madam, the name on your ticket is not that same as on your passport.
Me: (on my wife’s behalf). Yes it is, the passport just doesn’t have my wife’s middle name.
Clerk: But they must be identical or I cannot let you board.
Me: Well, what are we supposed to do now?
Clerk: Does your wife have any other identification with her middle name?
Me: We have my wife’s driver’s licence: it has an “L” for Louise on it.
Clerk – looking very doubtful: Very well, that will have to do. We’ll overlook it this time.
Me: (under my breath): &*^%

The second obstacle: Toronto airport security. The check-in clerk must have called ahead to alert the security staff that someone was on her way who had a middle name on her ticket but not on her passport and, therefore, was probably a terrorist. My wife was consequently groped and prodded in areas that hitherto had been my exclusive preserve – so she assures me. The groper was a woman, lessening the likelihood of inflaming  concupiscence through the squeezing of intimate body parts only slightly.

While this was occurring, a 300 pound Muslim lady waddled unmolested through security clad in a vast tent-like burka that could easily have concealed 100 pounds of gelignite.

On our way to Athens, we had to change planes in Charles De Gaulle airport, Paris. Our connecting flight was conveniently located at the opposite end of airport from where we landed, necessitating leaving the secure area and re-entering it at the furthest possible extremity of the building,

The Toronto Air France clerk clearly had taken her job very seriously and, in her zeal, called ahead to warn the security staff in Paris, too. My wife was probed once more in the same areas that had attracted so much attention in Toronto. I had to unpack a laptop, GPS, camera, chargers, book reader, lenses (me: “the lenses are glass”; French security maven: “mais non monsieur, zey have electroneecs”). Perhaps because I had tried to claim my camera lenses were just glass while knowing full-well they contained wires and chips, the security guard decided to subject me to the further humiliation of removing my trouser belt and making me shuffle through the metal detector with my pants sliding inexorably down my buttocks. I can’t be sure, but I think some of the female staff were snickering.

It took two hours to reach our connecting flight.

Resistance, of course, is futile. Any sign of reluctance would be met with orifice exploration and Tasers. Nevertheless, on returning to Toronto, I decided that some form of protest – mild enough to be mistaken for stupidity or eccentricity – was something from which I simply could not abstain.

I had contracted a mild cold on the last few days of our trip. By the time we were leaving it was mainly in my nose, so I spent most of the time on the way to Athens airport blowing the contents of my nasal cavity into paper tissues and, having nowhere else to put them, stuffing the used tissues into my pockets. It’s amazing how much material one nose can hold.

Having made me unpack my camera, lenses, laptop and so on, the Greek security guard uttered the words I had been anticipating: “empty your pockets, sir”.

Out came fifteen paper tissues in which were wrapped the bounty that my nose had manufactured overnight. As I held them three inches from the security guard’s face, I asked, “would you care to look through these?” “No, sir, put it back”. As I reached for my nose, the guard added – “in your pocket.” It wasn’t much, but it made me feel better.

The Monasteries of Metéora, Greece

These six Greek Orthodox monasteries, built between the 14th and 16th centuries, are located at Metéora and most are perched on high cliffs accessible by staircases cut into the rock and through a basket or net that is lowered by a rope from the top. Supplies are still hoisted up this way and, at one time, the monks were too.

The narthex of each, where unbaptized worshippers had to wait, is decorated with scenes of gruesome torture that early Christians had to endure: dismemberment, disembowelling, flaying and similar disincentives to holding fast to Christianity. The idea was to impress on new or prospective converts the sacrifices made by their forebears. Not what we would think of today as a warmly welcoming seeker friendly experience – but it worked, apparently.

To my intense annoyance, my DSLR body chose the second day of our excursion to self-destruct, so these photos are taken with a very limited point and shoot camera. Such was my frustration that my wife persuaded me to buy a replacement body when we returned to Athens.

Diocese of Niagara: the wolves are circling

From here:

Reflecting upon yesterday’s Supreme Court of Canada’s decision, Bishop Michael Bird, states: “The decision clears the way for us to proceed to a trial involving the disputed ownership of three parishes in the Diocese of Niagara. This matter has been deliberated upon at every level of our Canadian legal system and this most recent decision must surely remove any question as to our ownership of these properties. Like our counterparts in British Columbia, the issue of same-sex relationships is well behind us and we are fully engaged in the work of mission and re-visioning our church as it engages with and serves the people of this generation. The diocese has been very patient over these years but now we hope that this property dispute can be resolved quickly.”

The Diocese of Niagara has instructed its legal counsel to move forward expeditiously to bring this matter to trial.

Enjoy the orange carpet, Mike.