Anglicans playing poor me

From here:

The Rev. Sean Krausert is feeling grubby. He has been sleeping in a tent in his backyard for 19 days and bathing every four days.

An ordained deacon from St. Michael’s Church in Canmore, Alta., Krausert isn’t preparing an audition tape for Survivor. He’s been participating in “That Poverty Project,” a reality show of his own to raise awareness about poverty.

I don’t know about you, but I had no idea that there were poor people in the world until Rev. Sean started living in his tent. I consider my awareness now fully raised; I am sure the poor feel so much better because of it.

That is a very posh looking tent, though and, now I come to think of it, when I was growing up we only used to bath once every seven days – in a tin bath with water heated in a kettle. Since we all did it (not all at once) we didn’t know we smelt – or that we were poor. In fact, in spite of the fact that I grew up with little decent food because of post-war rationing, with no car, no phone, no TV, no central heating, no vacuum cleaner, no indoor toilet, (my alcoholic grandfather – whom I loved dearly – used to urinate in the kitchen sink), a coal fired stove for cooking and no spare money at all, my parents loved me very much and I had a deliriously happy childhood.

Of course, I had no idea I wasn’t supposed to be happy – my awareness had yet to be raised.

Anglican church meets in funeral home

The ACNA Holy Spirit Anglican Church meets in a funeral home. This may seem strange, but, unlike TEC Anglican parishes, the dead are firmly nailed in their coffins, not standing propped up in the pulpits.

From here:

Members of a new church in Folsom gather every Sunday in a location that many may consider unconventional. Since April, the Holy Spirit Anglican Church has been holding services in the chapel inside Miller Funeral Home on Scott Street.

The Rev. Carl Johnson, a Folsom Police chaplain, established the new site for the church because the next closest Anglican parish is located in Elk Grove, a considerably far drive for many Sacramento County residents.

“Folsom is somewhat centralized in the Sacramento area. It’s about 15 minutes from surrounding cities,” said Johnson.

The Anglican Church of North America’s Archbishop Robert Duncan has established a goal to plant 1,000 new churches in the United States within five years, according to David Trautman, communications director for the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh.

“Due to the small time frame, there won’t be enough church buildings available. The Folsom service at the funeral home is an example of how Anglicans are thinking creatively to reach out to the community,” said Duncan.

 

Abortion advocates know deep down that abortion is murder

As this article from Slate notes, people who are otherwise quite sanguine about aborting babies become queasy when it comes to the “reduction” – an obscene euphemism if ever there was one – of twins. The discrepancy is quite illogical.

Our conscience is given by God and, hardened though it may have become, we know that to abort a foetus is to kill a baby; a new reason to abort stirs suppressed misgivings and makes us question whether what we are doing is right.

The fact that we have, nevertheless, embarked on this new horror is, yet again, a testament to the depths of evil to which we are prepared to sink for the sake of mere convenience.

What’s worse than an abortion? Half an abortion.

It sounds like a bad joke. But it’s real. According to Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, demand is rising for “reduction” procedures in which a woman carrying twins keeps one and has the other aborted. Since twin pregnancies are generally safe, these abortions are largely elective.

Across the pro-choice blogosphere, including Slate, the article has provoked discomfort. RH Reality Check, a Web site dedicated to abortion rights, ran an item voicing qualms with one woman’s reduction decision. Jezebel, another pro-choice site, acknowledged the “complicated ethics” of reduction. Frances Kissling, a longtime reproductive rights leader, wrote a Washington Post essay asking whether women should forego fertility treatment rather than risk a twin pregnancy they’d end up half-aborting.

 

Parents should lose custody of obese kids, expert suggests

From here:

Parents should lose custody of children who suffer from life-threatening obesity, obesity specialists argue in a leading medical journal.

The opinion piece, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Wednesday by Lindsey Murtagh of the Harvard School of Public Health and Dr. David Ludwig of the Children’s Hospital in Boston, said putting children with severe obesity in foster care would act in the best interest of the child.

“In severe instances of childhood obesity, removal from the home may be justifiable from a legal standpoint because of imminent health risks and the parents’ chronic failure to address medical problems,” the article said.

[….]

According to Statistics Canada, 17 per cent of children in Canada are overweight and nine per cent are obese.

Too late for some, I fear.

 

Archbishop of Wales doesn’t understand the tenth commandment

First to give Barry Morgan some credit, he appears to understand that Jer. 17:9 applies to everyone, rich and poor alike, which is in itself something of a breakthrough for an archbishop.

ARCHBISHOP of Wales Barry Morgan yesterday warned that the British elite must put their own house in order as the country reels from the riots that shattered neighbourhoods across England last week.

Speaking shortly after Prime David Cameron condemned the UK’s “slow-motion moral collapse”, the Welsh Anglican leader warned that “desperate” young people had been set a poor example and Britain’s boardrooms needed a “clean sweep”.

Dr Morgan lambasted the “greed and selfishness” which existed at the top of society.

Unfortunately, Barry Morgan’s remedy for the fact that all men are sinners is for the successful sinners to work harder at being less successfully sinful , thereby presenting less of a temptation to covet to those of us not occupying boardrooms.

The irony here is that the real solution is right under the nose of the poor befuddled archbishop: yes, that’s right! His own church has the answer: Jesus took the sins of the poor and the rich upon himself. Too simple for the archbishop, I suppose. Still, maybe it will eventually come to him as he lounges in his bishop’s palace sipping sherry.

 

 

Anglicans against the bullying of nut allergy sufferers

Some Anglicans have a mania for denouncing the bullying of homosexuals while excluding from their righteous indignation equally deserving cases: for example, the bullying of those with nut allergies.

I myself am allergic to some nuts but I had no idea that others similarly afflicted are being bullied because of it. When will Anglicans become genuinely inclusive and rise up against this injustice, I ask myself?

From here:

Children with potentially deadly nut allergies are being bullied for being different, say researchers.

And their parents are stigmatised as ‘neurotic and attention-seeking’ by other parents, they found.

Relatives of some victims of the condition are even suspected of deliberately giving a child nuts to check they really are allergic.
Overall, the impact of a nut allergy is so great that it could be considered a disability, the Leicester University researchers found.

They interviewed 26 families from the Leicester area about their experiences.

Some children told how they were bullied by classmates, who taunted them about their allergy and threatened to trigger it.

 

 

 

Atheists running scared

From here:

Polly Toynbee, the Guardian columnist and president of the British Humanist Association, had agreed to debate the existence of God with the Research Professor of Philosophy at the Talbot School of Theology, California, Dr William Lane Craig, at Westminster Central Hall in October, during Professor Craig’s “Reasonable Faith” tour.

[.…]

The humanist philosopher Pro­fessor A. C. Grayling also refused to debate with Professor Craig

[….]

Professor Richard Dawkins has been invited to debate with Professor Craig in Oxford, on 25 October. If Professor Dawkins refuses, the organisers say that Professor Craig “will lecture on the weakness of Dawkins’s argu­ments in his book The God Delusion”.

Why don’t atheists like debating William Lane Craig? Because he uses logic and, as Polly Toynbee noted, that is not her kind of forum.

Peter Atkins, Pro­fessor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford, must have more guts than the others because he is going to debate Craig. If this 1998 exchange is anything to go by, it should be a rout.

What’s the difference between a Christian and an Episcopalian?

I have no idea, but even a secular sports writer recognises that they are not one and the same (my emphasis):

This is not simply about Tebow’s play, this is personal.

And even if he ends up being the worst quarterback in the history of quarterbacks, why are we OK with turning his Christianity into a punch line? If Tebow were a devout Muslim, would we snark about tenets of his religion? Or if he were Jewish? Or Buddhist? Or atheist? Or Espicopalian?

Maybe, but those cracks would be flagged by the PC crowd almost immediately. Christianity is fair game.

Is it just my imagination, or is the bold sentence a list religions in the order of the strength of their belief in an omnipotent, supernatural, omniscient God? Descending order.

Riotous Rowan pontificates on the looting

Rowan Williams offers ecclesiastical wisdom – or lack thereof – on the rioting in the UK:

Aug 11 (Reuters) – England’s most senior cleric on Thursday gave his first reaction to riots across the country, saying the government’s stated priority of building stronger communities was now a matter of urgency.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said the violence would “intensify the cycle of deprivation and vulnerability” in Britain, in a statement emailed to Reuters.

“The government has insisted on the priority of creating stronger, better-resourced local communities. This priority is now a matter of extreme urgency. We need to see initiatives that will address anxieties and provide some hope of long-term stability in community services, especially for the young,” he wrote.

I’m unsure as what kind of cycle of deprivation would include in its deprivations Blackberries with which to organise looting parties. I have no doubt that, had the government provided more community centres – offering free Blackberries, perhaps – they would have been looted too.

Rowan Williams has, predictably, placed the blame for the rioting on the government for not providing adequate community services, while, at the same time, missing the obvious fact that the government is to blame for not protecting its citizens.

The kind of long term stability that Rowan is looking for is not provided by governments but by families. What is his church doing to strengthen families? Oh, right, it’s promoting same sex marriage; that should do the trick.

British looting isn’t new

In the UK during the blitz looting was not uncommon:

One of the most shocking crimes committed during wartime was the looting from bombed houses. In the first eight weeks of the London Blitz a total of 390 cases of looting was reported to the police. On 9th November, 1940, the first people tried for looting took place at the Old Bailey. Of these twenty cases, ten involved members of the Auxiliary Fire Service.

The Lord Mayor of London suggested that notices should be posted throughout the city, reminding the population that looting was punishable by hanging or shooting. However, the courts continued to treat this crime leniently. When a gang of army deserters were convicted of looting in Kent the judge handed down sentences ranging from five years’ penal servitude to eight years’ hard labour.

I doubt that any of today’s looters will face eight years’ hard labour (most are unacquainted with labour of any sort), although public opinion is certainly becoming opposed to leniency:

– In common with Conservative MEP Roger Helmer, 33 per cent of the public believe the police should be allowed to shoot the rioters with live ammunition.

– 78 per cent support the use of tear gas.

– 72 per cent support the use of tasers.

– 82 per cent want curfews imposed.

– 90 per cent support the use of water cannon.

– 65 per cent support the use of plastic bullets.