Contrary to popular belief, Christopher Hitchens isn’t always wrong

From Slate:

French attempts to outlaw the burqa strike a blow for the rights of women.

The French legislators who seek to repudiate the wearing of the veil or the burqa—whether the garment covers “only” the face or the entire female body—are often described as seeking to impose a “ban.” To the contrary, they are attempting to lift a ban: a ban on the right of women to choose their own dress, a ban on the right of women to disagree with male and clerical authority, and a ban on the right of all citizens to look one another in the face. The proposed law is in the best traditions of the French republic, which declares all citizens equal before the law and—no less important—equal in the face of one another.

In contrast, Bishop Barry Clarke – a bellwether whose proclamations I routinely use as a litmus for ideological buffoonery – unsurprisingly opposes a similar ban in Quebec:

MONTREAL – A bill that would bar a woman wearing a face veil from receiving government services is an attack on women’s rights in the guise of defending equality of the sexes, say the Anglican diocese of Montreal and the Simone de Beauvoir Institute.

In a statement approved Monday night by local clergy and Bishop Barry Clarke, the diocese said the bill erodes freedom of religion guaranteed under the Quebec and Canadian human-rights charters.

2 thoughts on “Contrary to popular belief, Christopher Hitchens isn’t always wrong

  1. I think the ban is very wrong, and very dangerous. What’s next? A ban on wearing a cross? I don’t want the government telling me what I can and cannot wear, and if I want those rights, I have to defend them for others, too.

    The practical effect of the ban on women who think it is their religious duty to wear niquab or the burka (or women who are being forced to by their husbands) will be that they will be confined to her own homes; or, that their families will go back to where they came from. Which is better, having them go home, tell tales of the “decdant west”, and send their sons to schools where they will be taught to hate the west; or, allow them to dress as they like, send their sons and daughters to western schools and expose them to ideas other than the radical Islam that they are learning at home?

Leave a Reply