A comparison of two defamation lawsuits

Not an exhaustive comparison, just the highlights.

Ezra Levant is in court today fighting:

“an exceedingly political lawsuit” designed to shut him out of public debate, brought by a “master of lawfare.”

The details, so far as we know, include:

Court documents indicate this week’s trial will turn on Mr. Awan’s claim that Mr. Levant, on his blog in 2009, “variously described [him] as “Khurrum Awan the liar,” “stupid, a “fool,” a “serial, malicious, money-grubbing liar,” and “unequivocally implied that he was an anti-Semite and perjurer.”

Mr. Awan is asking for $50,000 in damages.

I will be attending Discoveries on Thursday for Michael Bird’s defamation suit against me. I can’t go into the specifics of what was said that has upset the bishop, but his claim for damages against me is $400,000.

An interesting contrast in amounts sought between the secular and the ecclesiastical.

3 thoughts on “A comparison of two defamation lawsuits

  1. Praying for you.

    Rule #1: Never get between an Anglican cleric and a bucket of money.

    When the unbelieving world shows less avarice than supposed “Christians”, you know the truth of what flourishes beneath the painted surface.

Leave a Reply