Decline and Fall

Paul Pennyfeather was reading for the Church at Scone College Oxford. The hapless Pennyfeather was relieved of his clothes by a group of drunks who didn’t like the look of Pennyfeather’s old school tie. In the words of the Master of Scone:

“‘The case of Pennyfeather,’ the Master was saying, ‘seems to be quite a different matter altogether. He ran the whole length of the quadrangle, you say, without his trousers. That is indecency. It is not the conduct we expect of a scholar.’”

For poor Pennyfeather it was downhill from then on. He ended up a teacher at a Llanabba Castle school in North Wales, a fourth-rate school according to the grading: Leading School, First-rate School, Good School, and School.

To find out what happens next, you will have to read Evelyn Waugh’s Decline and Fall.

The point is, it didn’t matter whether the removal of Pennyfeather’s trousers was voluntary or not; he was seen to be running trouserless; for appearances’ sake, something had to be done.

We will probably never know for sure whether Steve Wood was caught metaphorically sans-trousers, but the disastrous mess that ACNA has brought upon itself by thoroughly botching the plausible complaints against its most senior cleric means that, for the sake of appearances, it was almost inevitable that Wood was brought to trial.

Similarly, because appearances suggest that ACNA has been spending considerable energy in protecting the institution, I suspect that there will be pressure to find Wood guilty – to convince everyone that it’s doing no such thing.

The recent Report from the College of Bishops attempts to quiet the troops with vague promises to do better. I’m not sure that it reaches beyond the stage of advanced lip service.

I attended the first Provincial “Office Hours” with Bishop Dobbs and Provincial Leaders Zoom meeting. I was hoping for an interactive session with open discussion. Instead it was a format where questions were submitted in writing and the panel answered them – or didn’t.

My questions were:

  1. Why did it take so long to take the allegations against Steve Wood seriously – a year or more, I gather?

  2. It leaves one with the suspicion that it may never have been addressed had not the Washington Post article appeared. Comments?

The answer I received to part one was: that’s how long the process took. There was no comment on part two. This, it seems, is how you rebuild trust.

Archbishop Steve Wood hit with sexual misconduct and abuse of power accusations

This doesn’t look good:

The highest-ranking member of the Anglican Church of North America has been hit with a slew of allegations – including sexual misconduct, abuse of power, and plagiarism.

A recently revealed presentment, which is a formal report that details offenses by leaders in the church, alleges that Archbishop Stephen Wood, 62, attempted to kiss a female employee, plagiarized his sermons, and bullied church staffers before he moved up in rank.

The ACNA was founded in 2009 by former members of the Episcopal Church who opposed the congregation’s openness to LGBTQ+ Christians and progressive causes.

The religion is a form of Christianity, following the preaching in the Bible and celebrating traditional holidays like Christmas and Easter.

Over a decade after its inception, the church found itself riddled with controversy as new allegations surfaced against the ACNA’s senior-most official.

Claire Buxton, 42, has spoken out about her experience working as the children’s ministry director at St. Andrew’s Church in South Carolina while Wood was the rector.

Buxton detailed her experience in one of six affidavits submitted in the presentment, reviewed by the Washington Post, alleging Wood’s behavior.

She also claimed in an interview with the Post that last spring that Wood tried to kiss her in his office.

‘He put his hand on the back of my head and tried to turn it up towards him while he slowly brought his face towards my face to kiss me,’ Buxton told the outlet.

She said she avoided the kiss by dropping her head and gave him a side hug instead before running out of the office.

Although she said that the alleged kiss occurred in 2024, Buxton insisted that Wood’s inappropriate behavior began years before.

She told the Post that in October 2021 he hugged her at a celebration ceremony, and his hand slowly slid down her back.

Buxton said she told her parents about the awkward encounter, admitting that it felt ‘sensual’ and that she speculated he was attracted to her.

Her parents brushed it off, so she continued her work as the children’s ministry director.

However, a year later, Wood allegedly divulged inappropriate information to Buxton in his office.

He allegedly told her that he fired a church staffer because she ‘slept with everyone.’ That same year, Wood began giving Buxton mysterious checks from a church account.

[…….]

Numerous other members of the Anglican Church expressed concern with Wood’s behavior, including Reverend Hamilton Smith, the rector of St. Thomas’ Church in South Carolina.

In a letter obtained by the Post, Smith told Wood: ‘I do not feel you have moral authority required to hold the office of Bishop.’

Smith said he believed Wood plagiarized his sermons, shamed colleagues, and accepted a $60,000 truck provided by the diocese.

‘You have told me numerous times that you are a sinner who had “a really bad year/a horrible season” in which you did things you now regret. While I rejoice in this self understanding, grace and forgiveness have limits,’ Smith wrote in the letter.

Reverend Rob Sturdy, another priest who submitted an affidavit, wrote that Wood frequently boasted about a woman from another church whom he could’ve had a relationship with if he pursued it.

Rumblings of chaos in ACNA

Rt. Rev. Stewart Ruch III has been charged with the mishandling of sexual abuse disclosures and was being tried in an ecclesiastical court which was not open to the public.

The trial collapsed when the prosecutor, Alan Runyan, resigned because:

“the trial process had been irreparably tainted” by a member of the ACNA’s Court for the Trial of a Bishop who improperly questioned one of the prosecution’s witnesses for over an hour on the fifth day of trial.

The questioning allegedly brought in external material that had not been admitted into evidence by the court before the trial. This material, which pertained to the ACNA’s previous investigation rather than to the charges against Ruch, had been explicitly ruled improper by the court in an April 2025 pretrial order.

Archbishop Steve Wood appointed a new prosecutor so the trial could continue.

Meanwhile, Rachel Thebeau, the deputy prosecutor released a letter calling into question the integrity or competence – possibly both – of ACNA’s leadership. This was a career limiting move that led to her being persuaded to resign.

Archbishop Steve Wood has issued his own letter in response, a spectacle of duelling letters, defending himself and the other ACNA leaders tangled up in this:

The past few days have presented great challenges for our Anglican Church. As you may be aware, on Friday, a now-former employee of the province who was assisting in the prosecution for the ecclesiastical trial that is currently before the Court for the Trial of a Bishop, widely circulated a letter to individual members and clergy across the province that levels serious but misguided allegations against me, the provincial Chancellor, the Executive Director of the Province, and the Court. The letter suggests that we acted unethically and compromised the integrity of the Church. These accusations have sent a wave of pain, confusion, and division rippling across our province.

This makes me cringe, since the focus seems to be less on the truth or otherwise of Thebeau’s accusations and more on the aggravation it is causing ACNA leaders.

The College of Bishops has been pressed into service with yet another letter to help circle the ecclesiastical wagons. Maybe I’m imagining it, but it reads rather like a Trump cabinet meeting where toadying is the order of the day. The standout sentence is this piece of Newspeak: ” We are grateful for their ongoing commitment to appropriate levels of transparency”

Where is the truth in all this? I don’t know. What I do know is that the whole process is exceedingly murky and that makes me very suspicious.

There are some more opinions in the latest Anglican Unscripted:

 

On social justice, ACNA now in hot pursuit of TEC

I recently received an email extoling the benefits of attending a new ACNA course: Living Isa58, a project of the Matthew 25 Initiative (M25i for those who dislike typing).

There is a lot of what I would consider gobbledegook in the Matthew 25 Initiative. Here, (you have to sign up to read the whole thing) for example:

God’s purposes for this world are not for its destruction, but for its renewal. In the end, shalom is rewoven through all of creation and within all of God’s people. Peacemaking, then, is the work of co-substantiating this hope, the Kingdom of God, with God. It is pursuing justice and the reweaving of shalom with an orientation to healing and repair.

That sounds like what William Buckley used to call immanentizing the eschaton, although the next sentence was included to allay that suspicion:

God leads the work and will accomplish it fully at the final consummation of the new order, when heaven and earth become one. But today we are God’s co-creators: we are given the agency and ability to help put flesh on this coming Kingdom now. In word and deed, it is the very work of declaring the good news of the gospel: that Jesus is King and His Kingdom is at hand.

I remain suspicious and wonder whether the authors remember that Jesus also said “My Kingdom is not of this world”.

Archbishop Steve Wood has recorded a video on the Matthew 25 Initiative:

It was recorded in March and has had 285 views. One of those views was me. Such is the level of interest in what he had to say.

In his video he laments that some of what he says might be interpreted as political whereas, really, it is just the Gospel. He’s right, that is how I interpreted it. I have no problem with clergy venting their political inclinations, I just wish they wouldn’t call it the Gospel.

That’s how the rot set in with TEC and the ACoC.

For more evidence that this is political – generally left-leaning – the M25i’s white paper on peace-making (you have to sign up to see it) quotes a  Palestinian theologian Rev. Dr. Mitri Raheb:

“Rev. Dr. Mitri Raheb states, “Hope is what you do.”

I’m not sure what he means by that but, elsewhere, Rev. Dr. Mitri Raheb is perfectly clear and perfectly political: Israel is committing war crimes in Gaza and the solution is political action. He doesn’t mention Hamas or any responsibility it might bear.

From here:

Yet, the more I thought about it, the more I started understanding her answer. In this context of a war crime, committed against the civilian population in Gaza, what is needed is more than prayer; what is needed is advocacy, what is needed is political action, what is needed is for people to go on the streets demanding an end to this aggression.

Similarly an M25i (yes, I know the abbreviation is irritating. It sounds like a UK motorway) white paper on immigration regrets that:

Churches in North America may not always be able to substantially influence public policy or affect changes to current laws that seem unjust, out-dated or contradictory.

The author clearly wants to influence public policy, a position I wouldn’t necessarily quarrel with had his archbishop not claim that it’s all about the Gospel not politics.

To be clear, as individuals I’m all for the Gospel influencing our political choices, but I’m wary when clergy start equating those choices with the Gospel.

Even allowing for the fact that, on occasion, I am given to undue pessimism, none of this looks good for ACNA.