I knew, deep down, that Dawkins had a more profound understanding of life’s fathomless metaphysical purpose than he has hitherto let on:
Sex, is that all that matters? Why not come out and say the Holy Father should have been a lesbian.
Richard, if you want to discover a wasted life, read your tweets and books.
…at the moment the elderly Archbishop laid his hands on me, a little bird – perhaps a lark – flew up from the altar in the high cathedral and trilled a little joyful song.
Don’t agree with some of his policies but rather him than Fred & Kate Gong Show
What do we expect? Dawkins thinks we’re all animals with an unusually large brain, and that biology explains everything. Is it surprising then to find that the basic animal function, and the basest animal instincts are the lodestone of his life?
Note that he refers to “sex”, not “making love”. A Christian can make love to his wife; or to her husband. An atheist is simply engaging in the rewards of his evolutionary endowed fitness that provides him with the pleasure of copulation.
Gotta love the human dignity enriching nature of atheism.
I feel sorry for old atheists, who always seem to be so angry and graceless — and nonetheless obsessed with religion.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
Notify me of new posts by email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
© Copyright 2013. Anglican Samizdat. All Rights Reserved.
This site is powered by WordPress and the Basic Simplicity theme by Michael Janzen
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox
Join other followers: