{"id":9280,"date":"2010-07-08T19:13:42","date_gmt":"2010-07-08T23:13:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/?p=9280"},"modified":"2010-07-08T19:13:42","modified_gmt":"2010-07-08T23:13:42","slug":"a-shocking-breach-of-playboys-standards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/a-shocking-breach-of-playboys-standards\/","title":{"rendered":"A shocking breach of Playboy\u2019s standards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Playboy has standards? Apparently <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/worldnews\/article-1293176\/Playboy-slams-shocking-breach-standards-Portuguese-edition-features-Jesus-Christ-topless-models.html?ITO=1490\" target=\"_blank\">it does<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Playboy magazine is to pull the plug on its Portuguese edition after it ran a photo shoot featuring Jesus Christ among topless models.<\/p>\n<p>The spread was ostensibly a tribute to Nobel Prize-winning author Jose Saramago\u2019s The Gospel According to Jesus Christ, but Hugh Hefner\u2019s headquarters have reacted with outrage.<\/p>\n<p>The pictures show a long-haired, glowing Jesus watching two models in a lesbian clinch, standing next to a prostitute and looking over the shoulder of a woman reading a book.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018It is a shocking breach of our standards and we would have not allowed it to be published if we had seen it in advance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Presumably Hugh Hefner doesn\u2019t want to lose his Southern Baptist customer base.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Playboy has standards? Apparently it does: Playboy magazine is to pull the plug on its Portuguese edition after it ran a photo shoot featuring Jesus Christ among topless models. The spread was ostensibly a tribute to Nobel Prize-winning author Jose &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/a-shocking-breach-of-playboys-standards\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":2,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1235],"class_list":["post-9280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-playboy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9280\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}