It may appear to be, though. For example, synod has scheduled six sessions on \u201csexuality discernment\u201d \u2013 church-speak for deciding whether to bless same-sex unions \u2013 yet only two sessions on financial management. This may not be an ideal allocation of time, considering the demise of the Anglican Church is being hastened by a lack of cash as much as by an excess of prurience.<\/p>\n
In an attempt to address its financial embarrassment, the Anglican Church of Canada has sought corporate sponsors<\/a> to help pay for synod; the degree of sponsorship peaks at the \u201cvisionary\u201d level which, for $30,000 will not only buy you tasteful Anglican advertising, but a private lunch with Primate Fred Hiltz. Although this is an enticement that few could resist, I haven\u2019t seen many corporate logos in evidence at synod; come to think of it, I haven\u2019t seen any. It can\u2019t be merely coincidental that the Director of Philanthropy, whose idea it was, has just resigned<\/a>.<\/p>\n Luckily for the church, a number of generous bequests in 2009 balanced the budget; dead Anglicans won\u2019t keep the church afloat for long, though, so the living are also being vigorously exhorted to part with their money.<\/p>\n I was delighted to be invited to participate in some of the press conferences that have take place at noon each day. On Friday I was introduced to the refined art of advanced ecclesiastical sophistry by Archbishop Hiltz who expounded on which of the following circumstances would break the moratorium imposed by the Archbishop of Canterbury on same-sex blessings (yes, I know I am going on about sex again, but I just can\u2019t get away from it). Here are the circumstances and the answers:<\/p>\n Synod passes a motion that approves same-sex blessings. This would break the moratorium. The distinguishing feature of the last option is that it is not \u201cformal\u201d; the fact that what should not<\/em> happen is<\/em> happening is immaterial so long as it is happening informally. A secular equivalent would be a loose association of astute crooks committing uncoordinated burglaries, emboldened by the certain knowledge that the informality of their crimes insulates them from prosecution.<\/p>\n In another press conference, Suheil Dawani, Bishop of Jerusalem unintentionally illustrated part of the malaise afflicting the Anglican Church. In his address he eloquently spoke of his efforts to mediate between warring factions in the Middle-East; he expressed his distress at the fact that Christians are a diminishing two percent of the population. In the interview afterwards I asked him whether he is trying to replenish the dwindling Christian population by making new Christians \u2013 by converting Muslims, for instance. \u201cNo\u201d, he said, \u201cwe are not evangelical; we are just trying to preserve the \u2018living stones\u2019 (Christians) already there.\u201d For a liberal \u2013 and to be invited to speak at an Anglican General Synod, that\u2019s what you have to be – this makes perfect sense. Liberals tend to believe that Christianity is one of many paths that lead to God. The good bishop could not quite see that his liberalism is chipping its way through the branch on which he is perched: if Christianity is not unique, if it has no truth to offer that is inaccessible to other religions, there isn\u2019t too much point in keeping Anglicanism, synods, dioceses, parishes or even bishops on artificial life support. What reason could there be, other than nostalgia, for not letting this particular path fade gracefully away?<\/p>\n Speaking of fading away, synod is not quite at the half way point and my ability \u2013 or perhaps willingness – to concentrate seems to be decreasing as the talking increases. And Anglicans do like to talk. Still, there\u2019s plenty more to come on \u201csexuality discernment\u201d; that should liven everything up.<\/p>\n A slightly condensed version of this article can be found at the National Post<\/a>. Also on Eternity Magazine<\/a>. It may appear to be, though. For example, synod has scheduled six sessions on \u201csexuality discernment\u201d \u2013 church-speak for deciding whether to bless same-sex unions \u2013 yet only two sessions on financial management. This may not be an ideal allocation … Continue reading
\nSynod passes a motion that allows dioceses to decide for themselves whether to conduct same-sex blessings. This would break the moratorium.
\nSynod passes no motion, but continues to ignore dioceses that are already blessing same-sex unions and those who are about to start. This would not break the moratorium.<\/p>\n
\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"