One comes to expect pharisaic phrases from the Anglican hierarchy, but none can set the teeth on edge quite as effectively as “gracious restraint”. It is one thing to bend words to make them convey something slightly different from their natural meaning; it is quite another to make them mean the exact opposite. “Gracious restraint” has become “graceless abandon”.<\/p>\n
The bishop of Ottawa, John Chapman is the beneficiary of the usual liberal seminary indoctrination and has executed a perfect parisologist’s pirouette \u00a0to subvert meaning, make black white and apply Anglican Alchemy to make sense nonsense.<\/p>\n
Thus, in a spasm of tangled antimony he manages to say<\/a>:<\/p>\n I must be committed to honouring the church’s need to observe gracious restraint and as well, honour the prayer and discernment that has unfolded in the Diocese these last many decades. With these concerns in mind, I proposed to Synod 2008 that I would bring before the Canadian House of Bishops the following intention: That, we, in Ottawa, begin to explore experientially, the blessing of duly solemnized and registered civil marriages between same-sex couples, where at least one party is baptized.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Chapman is in the malodorous company of Ingham and Bird (whom, for Lent,\u00a0 I have forsworn calling short) and I would be equally critical of all three, if it were not for an impulse to exercise gracious restraint.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One comes to expect pharisaic phrases from the Anglican hierarchy, but none can set the teeth on edge quite as effectively as “gracious restraint”. It is one thing to bend words to make them convey something slightly different from their … Continue reading