{"id":29697,"date":"2022-07-26T16:15:00","date_gmt":"2022-07-26T20:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/?p=29697"},"modified":"2022-07-26T17:56:28","modified_gmt":"2022-07-26T21:56:28","slug":"traditional-marriage-is-controversial-in-the-anglican-church-of-canada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/traditional-marriage-is-controversial-in-the-anglican-church-of-canada\/","title":{"rendered":"Traditional marriage is controversial in the Anglican Church of Canada"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>The Anglican Journal has an article covering the rewriting of the Lambeth Call on Human Dignity<\/a>. The headline is \u201cSame-sex marriage controversy erupts pre-Lambeth\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

In case you are wondering what the controversy is, the body of the article offers clarification. It\u2019s defining marriage as the union of a man and woman rather than two men. In the Anglican Church of Canada, to avoid controversy, we have to all agree that two men can marry each other.<\/p>\n

From here<\/a> (emphasis mine):<\/p>\n

A draft Lambeth Conference statement reaffirming a 1998 resolution that describes marriage as the union of a man and a woman has been revised, with the resolution now mentioned but not explicitly reaffirmed. On Tuesday, Lambeth Conference staff published a new version of the Lambeth Calls, with several revisions, including the removal of the call to reaffirm 1998\u2019s controversial resolution I.10 on same-sex marriage.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What level of insanity have we reached when a church newspaper tells us that \u201cmarriage is confined to men marrying women\u201d is a controversial proposition? Is this an example of \u201cthose whom God wishes to destroy he first makes mad\u201d? Let\u2019s hope so.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Anglican Journal has an article covering the rewriting of the Lambeth Call on Human Dignity. The headline is \u201cSame-sex marriage controversy erupts pre-Lambeth\u201d. In case you are wondering what the controversy is, the body of the article offers clarification. … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":3,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2700],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lambeth-2022"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29697\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}