As a callow youth I was an avid reader of Leo Tolstoy and became convinced that he was on to something in his impassioned support of pacifism.<\/p>\n
Time passed and it occurred to me that to be a comfortable pacifist in a society whose order is maintained by the application of force is, at the very least, hypocritical. The Anglican Church of Canada is no stranger to hypocrisy, of course, so it is no surprise that some of its reverend gentlemen support pacifism.<\/p>\n
The Rev. R. G. Cross has made his case for pacifism here<\/a>.<\/p>\n Sadly, he does leave out one of the more interesting comments made by a 19-20C pacifist, Lytton Strachey. His remark is uncanny in its prescient applicability to today\u2019s Anglican clergy. Strachey was a homosexual and when asked, “If a German soldier tried to rape your sister, what would you do”” slyly replied; “I would try to interpose my own body.”<\/p>\n Many would argue that non-violence is not a practical subject to be explored in the church\u2019s life. Since the days of Constantine, the church has supported empire, the concept of the just war and the right of citizens to defend themselves against aggressors.\u2028 Violence appears to be an integral part of the universe, and personal violence necessary, in some instances, to affirm self esteem in the face of continuing injustice and oppression.<\/p>\n [\u2026\u2026]<\/p>\n What is the non-violent answer? The rejection of the use of force to achieve social and political goals. It involves refusal to harm another being.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As a callow youth I was an avid reader of Leo Tolstoy and became convinced that he was on to something in his impassioned support of pacifism. Time passed and it occurred to me that to be a comfortable pacifist … Continue reading