{"id":1430,"date":"2008-12-19T18:15:10","date_gmt":"2008-12-19T22:15:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/anglicansamizdat.wordpress.com\/?p=1430"},"modified":"2008-12-19T18:15:10","modified_gmt":"2008-12-19T22:15:10","slug":"the-purpose-driven-athiest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/the-purpose-driven-athiest\/","title":{"rendered":"The Purpose Driven Atheist"},"content":{"rendered":"

One of the good things about Rick Warren\u2019s appearance at the impeding inauguration is that it has upset just about everyone. Including Christopher Hitchens, who appears to be descending rapidly into amusing but outlandish rhetoric<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Add<\/p>\n

If we must have an officiating priest, surely we can do better than this vulgar huckster.<\/strong><\/p>\n

if someone publicly charges that “Mormonism is a cult,” it is impossible to say that the claim by itself is mistaken or untrue. However, if the speaker says that heaven is a real place but that you will not get there if you are Jewish, or that Mormonism is a cult and a false religion but that other churches and faiths are the genuine article, then you know that the bigot has spoken. That’s all in a day’s work for the wonderful world of the American evangelical community, and one wishes them all the best of luck in their energetic fundraising and their happy-clappy Sunday “Churchianity” mega-feel-good fiestas. However, do we want these weirdos and creeps officiating in any capacity at the inauguration of the next president of the United States?<\/p>\n

[\u2026..]<\/p>\n

I would myself say that it doesn’t need a clerical invocation at all, since, to borrow Lincoln’s observation about Gettysburg, it has already been consecrated. But if we must have an officiating priest, let it be some dignified old hypocrite with no factional allegiance and not a tree-shaking huckster and publicity seeker who believes that millions of his fellow citizens are hellbound because they do not meet his own low and vulgar standards.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Hitchens appears to wander unawares into the old fallacy of thinking that the idea of one religion alone being true is bigotry;\u00a0 the obverse \u2013 which he doesn\u2019t believe either, of course \u2013 is that all religions are equally true, an absurd notion, since they all contradict each other to some degree. In fact, Hitchens is a member of\u00a0 the Church of Transcendent Atheists whose\u00a0 sub-rational aphorisms are fiercely\u00a0 proclaimed through the obligatory alcoholic haze.<\/p>\n

Once again, Hitchens presents us with a cacophony of insults (happy-clappy Sunday “Churchianity”; weirdos and creeps etc.) rather than the rationality of which he claims to be a champion. Dawkins isn\u2019t too different when pushed: in one of his diatribes he quoted an acquaintance who said, \u201cif you don\u2019t like science, you can fuck off\u201d. Very Darwinian.<\/p>\n

Hitchens\u2019 last paragraph is instructive. When it comes to religion, apparently dignified hypocrisy is to be preferred over crass honesty; appearance over reality; the shaman over the priest.<\/p>\n

To Hitchens, as to all unbelievers, the biggest affront is the claim that hell exists and that they have freely chosen to be its occupants. I can\u2019t help wondering, though, whether Hitchens on his deathbed will do a Lord Marchmain and make the object of his lifelong mockery a last gesture.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

One of the good things about Rick Warren\u2019s appearance at the impeding inauguration is that it has upset just about everyone. Including Christopher Hitchens, who appears to be descending rapidly into amusing but outlandish rhetoric. If we must have an … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[75,256],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christianity","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.anglicansamizdat.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}