Pedants of pornography

From here:

The new academic journal Porn Studies, due to start publication in spring 2014, has called for submissions of articles, scholarly papers and book reviews.

U.K. publisher Taylor & Francis says it will be “the first dedicated, international, peer-reviewed journal” devoted to the study of pornographic products and services in the contexts of culture, history, economy, society and the law.

Content will explore the “intersection of sexuality, gender, race, class, age and ability.”

Several educators and authors have provided endorsements for the journal, which will be edited by two women – British academics Feona Attwood and Clarissa Smith.

“Porn Studies is a wonderful and much-needed resource for anyone interested in pornography and its relationship to wider cultural contexts,” Ronald Weitzer of George Washington University said. “The journal addresses virtually every aspect of porn and will challenge readers with novel, cutting-edge articles on the topic.”

In 1964 when Justice Potter Stewart made the famous observation that, although he could not define pornography, he knew it when he saw it, he could not have anticipated that in 2013, academics would still be trying to figure out just what it is “in the contexts of culture, history, economy, society and the law”.

I suppose the heartening thing about this is that there must still be a vestige of shame left in academia. After all, everyone knows that these prurient pedants simply want to look at naughty magazines but at least they have the decency to erect a smoke screen of respectability to conceal their scholarly concupiscence.

Pornographic vegetarianism

PETA, in a flash of marketing insight, has decided that treating women as pieces of meat will prevent cows suffering a similar fate.

From here:

An animal rights group, which is no stranger to attention-grabbing campaigns featuring nude women, plans to launch a pornography website to raise awareness about veganism.

[….]

Visitors to the X-rated site will initially be presented with pornographic content as well as images from PETA’s salacious ads and campaigns, Rajt said. Those images will be followed by pictures and video shot undercover of the mistreatment of animals. The site will also include links to vegetarian and vegan — using no animal products — starter kits as well as recipes.

No doubt pornography addicts will be lining up in droves for their vegetarian starter kits.

Bin corrupted by the West Laden

It seems he was watching pornography in his hideaway – when he wasn’t watching himself, that is.

From here:

(Reuters) – A stash of pornography was found in the hideout of Osama bin Laden by the U.S. commandos who killed him, current and former U.S. officials said on Friday.

The pornography recovered in bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, consists of modern, electronically recorded video and is fairly extensive, according to the officials, who discussed the discovery with Reuters on condition of anonymity.

While this may seem not just grossly hypocritical but thoroughly odd, it actually isn’t: Muslim countries are full of men eagerly searching for “sex” on the Internet, presumably because it’s in keeping with Islam’s penchant for regarding women as objects:

According to Google Trends, over all years for which data has been gathered, seven out of the top ten countries searching for the word ’sex’ on the internet are Muslim Countries. In order of viewing, these Muslim countries are : Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Algeria, Morocco, Indonesia and Iran.

St. Mary's vs. Good Vibrations

From here:Add an Image

AN Anglican priest is furious that a sex shop will open today, Easter Saturday, opposite his church.

Reverend Nick Wallace wants the Good Vibrations adult shop on South Rd, Clovelly Park, closed.

“I’m absolutely outraged,” Reverend Wallace said.

“We at St Mary’s feel as if we’ve been ignored and treated with contempt by not being consulted about this shop which faces directly across from our heritage cemetery and place of worship.”

The adult store, which was previously occupied by a paint shop, is within the boundary of Marion Council, but the church is within Mitcham Council’s area.

Perhaps the church should look at this as an opportunity: parade around the “adult” (that term always amuses me, since there could scarcely be a more childish view of sex than that of pornography) shop carrying placards warning the patrons of the deleterious effects of smut on their sex lives. Hand out tracts containing the four spiritual laws. Photograph people entering the store and publish the images on the church website with the offer to buy prints. Send the choir into the store to sing hymns.

The possibilities are endless.

.xxx domains are about to arrive

Pornography is about to get its own domain suffix.

From here:

After a 10-year battle, Internet watchdog Icann has finally given in to the creation of an Internet domain dedicated to pornography.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which governs the website naming system, yesterday approved the creation of a top level ‘.xxx’ domain, opening the way for a red-light district online for pornographic websites.

Icann gave initial approval last year, but carried out further consultation checks over the application.

It is now poised to sign an agreement with the ICM Registry, which is backing the domain, allowing .xxx the same level status as .com and .org.

Religious groups argue that giving adult websites their own corner of the Internet legitimises the content.

But pornographers aren’t happy either, and worry it will ghettoise their sites.

I’m in at least three minds about this:

First, I am in favour of free speech on the Internet and that includes saying and displaying things I disagree with.

Second, I think pornography is harmful; since we are well past the stage where it can be banned, ghettoising it might be the next best thing.

Third, pornography is only a symptom of Western decay; to focus energy on its evils is to treat the symptom, not the disease. The West needs more radical medicine.

I think I’ll settle on number three, garnished with number 2.

 

 

 

Amazon defends selling a book entitled “The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure”

From here:

The e-book, authored by Phillips Greaves, was published late last month, according to product details on Amazon.com. It sells for $4.79 on the company’s Kindle Store.

“This is my attempt to make pedophile situations safer for those juveniles that find themselves involved in them, by establishing certian [sic] rules for these adults to follow,” a product description reads. “I hope to achieve this by appealing to the better nature of pedosexuals, with hope that their doing so will result in less hatred and perhaps liter sentences should they ever be caught.”

Amazon is standing by the decision to sell the e-book.

“Amazon believes it is censorship not to sell certain books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable,” the company said in a written statement. “Amazon does not support or promote hatred or criminal acts, however, we do support the right of every individual to make their own purchasing decisions.”

In the last month or so the book has had 1737 consumer reviews on Amazon, 1688 of them negative. I rather doubt that most of the reviewers have actually read the book, but this might be a rare occasion when judging a book by its cover isn’t such a bad idea.

Our civilisation has reached a grubbily sordid point when a vendor of books feels the need to appeal to the evils of censorship to justify publishing a how-to for pedophiles by a barely literate imbecile.

I generally dislike slippery slope arguments, but this all started when I was a teenager and D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover was the subject of an obscenity trial. The book was deemed not obscene by the jury – partly because it was thought to have literary merit; the jury was wrong on both counts. I was delighted at the time since it meant I could get my hands on a copy. Lady Chatterley was rapidly followed by Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer, Tropic of Capricorn, Nexus, Plexus and Sexus – all of which I devoured with considerable interest; even then I noticed Miller’s books were marginally more literate than Lawrence’s,  although that was not what had initially piqued my interest in them.

Since then, of course, our pornography has not needed redeeming features of any sort and we have – I hesitate to say struck bottom – reached a nadir: Pedophilia for Dummies.

Update: Within the last hour or so (it’s 11:19 p.m. EST), Amazon has removed the book from its site. When it was there, it looked like this:

Pornographic Jesus art attacked with crowbar

From here:

A Montana woman is alleged to have driven 1,500 kilometres from Montana to a museum in Loveland, Colo., so she could rip up a controversial piece of art featuring Jesus.

Kathleen Folden, a 56-year-old truck driver, is charged with criminal mischief in the case.

The collage by Enrique Chagoila has been denounced by church members as obscene as it includes a head of Jesus and a woman’s body engaged in a sex act.

In my opinion, it’s rather sad taking away people’s freedom to see the art,” Corey said.

Chagoya, a Stanford University professor who created the work, titled The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals, denied the work suggests Jesus having sex.

His 12-panel lithograph is a collage that includes comic book characters, Mexican pornography, Mayan symbols and a skeleton with a pope’s hat.

“What I’m trying to express is the corruption of the spiritual by the church,” Chagoya said.

He said the decision not to display the work again amounts to suppression of art.

In his eagerness to “express the corruption of the spiritual by the church”, what Chagoya has missed is the fact that Folden drove all the way from Montana to express the spiritualisation of corruption by artists, an expression that is, itself, art and, by Chagoya’s own lights, not only permissible, but virtuous.

It’s disappointing to see Chagoya trying to suppress the work of a fellow artist.

Pornographic art portraying Jesus provokes outrage

From here:

An exhibit at a Colorado art gallery is stirring up outrage from critics who say it depicts Jesus Christ in a sexual act.

Enrique Chagoya’s “The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals,” created in 2003, is a multipanel piece in which “cultural and religious icons are presented with humor and placed in contradictory, unexpected and sometimes controversial contexts,” the artist’s publisher, Shark’s Ink, said on its website.

The lithograph, on display since Sept. 11 at the tax-funded Loveland Museum Gallery in Loveland, Colo., is part of an 82-print exhibit by 10 artists who have worked with Colorado printer Bud Shark. It includes several images of Jesus, including one in which he appears to be receiving oral sex from a man as the word “orgasm” appears beside Jesus’ head.

Amidst worldwide Christian rioting, hundreds have been killed, taxpayers in Colorado have taken tax inspectors hostage in a local mosque – sorry, cultural centre – President Obama has called the exhibit “un-American”, media are refusing to publish photos for fears of reprisals and imams in notorious Islamo-fascist theocracies say they can’t understand what all the fuss is about.

The Archbishop of Canterbury is calling for dialogue with the artist.

The pornogrification of parliament

It had to happen eventually, I suppose:

So far, she has been a staunch advocate of all things blue.

The first woman in Britain to direct adult films revealed yesterday, however, that her political colours are of a different hue.

Anna Arrowsmith, hailed in some quarters as a champion of ‘female-friendly porn’, has been chosen as a Liberal Democrat candidate in the General Election.

If elected, Ms. Arrowsmith will be spending most of her time in the parliamentary locker-room showers with her camera.