When I was a teenager I rebelled against my parents, society and just about anything that bore an aura of respectability. This found expression in anarchism, atheism, Bob Dylan, Jean-Paul Sartre, Henry Miller and indulgence in the usual variety of teenage-angst anodynes on offer in the ‘60s.
Still, as silly as it all sounds now, I don’t think we were as dismally humourless as today’s youth; and we didn’t need safe spaces.
Eventually I grew up.
In order to rebel today, teenagers like to proclaim a sexual identity that is at odds with their biology. In keeping with its neurotic compulsion to appear modern, relevant and trendy, the Anglican Church of Canada encourages them to do so.
Which brings me to this:
Note: Jordan Sandrock, the subject of this article, identifies as neither male nor female and has asked to be referred to in this article as “they” rather than as “he” or “she.”
Also, the term “queer,” though considered derogatory by some, is widely used to denote non-heterosexual people, often by non-heterosexual people themselves.
Jordan Sandrock isn’t able to say what was going through their head when, after hearing the first pronouncement on the same-sex marriage vote at General Synod, they rushed out of the conference room where the vote was held and collapsed in tears on the floor of the corridor outside.
“It was just so emotionally overwhelming that I can’t really remember,” they say.
[….]
Sandrock is now going into their second year of a degree in religious studies at the University of Ottawa. Asked about their career goals, they don’t hesitate.
“I’m hoping to be a priest,” they say, smiling broadly.
Perhaps Jordan will eventually grow up. In the meantime, she seems to me to be one rather sweet but very mixed up kid.
Here they are explaining queer and feminist theology:
at least she had the integrity to leave the Catholic church, although if she left because she was being taught the bible, I wonder why she chose the ACoC. Oh well, it worked out in the end for her.
She may well think it worked out in the end. However, any decision(s) made by any church body that is contrary to either the authority of Scripture or the uniqueness of Jesus Christ can only be considered apostasy. As human being we clearly know what our gender is and there is no basis from a Christian standpoint for any acceptance of the thinking of the so-called gay and lesbian group.
Just needs a good kicking. This sort of thing is what people do, who’ve never wanted for the slightest thing.
Not only confused about gender, but grammar as well. Is they plural or are they singular? There is only one person here, but being spoken about as plural, which would be the normal case with the pronoun, “they.” All pretty silly, aren’t it? At least they doesn’t say “we” want to be priests.
Rather like Gollum.